Ski Pole Roundup — 2019

Blister's Ski Pole Roundup — 2019
Jonathan Ellsworth using the Scott Team Issue Ski Poles, Crested Butte, Co.
Review Navigation:  Intro //  Fixed-Length Poles //  Adjustable-Length Poles

Intro

After spending dozens of seasons and hundreds of days using a whole bunch of ski poles, we can state with certainty that they are not all the same. Some are great for their durability, others their low weight, and others for how small they can pack down. So we’re going to talk about several options that range from burly inbounds poles to others that are designed for technical and consequential backcountry terrain. Take a look and see which ones might work best for you.

Fixed-Length Poles

Scott Team Issue Ski Poles
MSRP: $109.95
Available Lengths: 95, 100, 105, 110, 115, 120, 125, 130, 135 cm
Shaft Material: 18 mm Aluminum
Blister’s Measured Weight (115 cm): 242 grams

Blister's Ski Pole Roundup — 2019
Scott Team Issue Ski Pole

After many years of using them, the Scott Team Issue ski poles have become our reference poles, and won multiple “Best Of” awards in our Winter Buyer’s Guides. They’ve proved to be exceptionally durable, they’re not super heavy, and we basically have no problems with them. Our editor-in-chief, Jonathan Ellsworth, has used multiple pairs for several hundred days without any of them breaking. That’s right — none of them. That’s extremely impressive. If you find yourself breaking poles often, prioritize durability, or simply want to get one pair of poles and stop worrying about them forever, the Scott Team Issue Ski Poles are our top pick.

 

J Skis Titanal Ski Poles
MSRP: $99
Available Lengths: 95, 100, 105, 110, 115, 120, 125, 130 cm
Shaft Material: ~16 mm Titanal Aluminum
Blister’s Measured Weight (110 cm): 215 grams

Blister's Ski Pole Roundup — 2019
J Skis Titanal Ski Pole

There are two things about J Skis’ Titanal Ski Poles that make them stand out: (1) their low weight and (2) their two-year warranty. First and foremost, the J Skis poles feel super light. While I can eventually get used to a heavier pole, every time I switch back to the J Skis poles, I am amazed by just how light they feel. But unlike similarly light carbon poles, the J Skis Titanal poles have proved to be pretty durable. I’ve used them for around 100 days inbounds, and while the paint is scratched up, they’ve otherwise held up well.

I’ve bent them slightly near the basket, but was able to bend them back without snapping them. That’s something I have not been able to do with most aluminum poles, and J attributes it to his poles’ titanal construction (the same metal alloy used in some skis).

The one issue I did have was one of the pole basket attachments getting knocked off after around 100 days, but this was covered under the two-year warranty (something that can’t be said for most poles on the market).

Another thing I like about the J Skis poles is their grip — it’s soft and fully rubberized. Not only does that mean it’s easy to hold onto, but it also means that the grip sticks well to binding heel risers and boot buckles, allowing me to easily flip risers or buckles with the end of my pole.

If you want very light fixed-length poles but don’t want to get some fragile carbon sticks, I highly recommend the J Skis Titanal Ski Poles.

 

Zipline Blurr 16.0 Graphite Composite Ski Poles
MSRP: $109
Available Lengths: 85, 90, 96, 102, 107, 112, 117, 122, 127, 132 cm
Shaft Material: 16 mm Graphite Composite
Blister’s Measured Weight (112 cm): 234 grams

Blister's Ski Pole Roundup — 2019
Zipline Blurr 16.0 Graphite Composite Ski Poles

Zipline’s poles use a graphite composite that, at least so far, has proved to be more durable than most of the carbon poles we’ve used. The Zipline poles aren’t crazy light, but they are a bit lighter than thick aluminum options like the Scott Team Issue, making them a solid option if you value low weight but also durability.

We’ve used three pairs of Zipline’s poles for a total of around 30 days and have had no issues with them so far. The paint’s chipping a bit, but we haven’t used any poles that completely resist chipping. The Zipline poles’ grips use a combination of plastic and rubber, which equates to good grip with a variety of gloves. Since the top of the grip is plastic, the Zipline poles’ grips aren’t quite as good when it comes to flicking up binding heel risers or boot buckles, but the large grip still makes this feasible.

All in all, we have no real complaints about the Zipline poles — they’re solid all-round options. The true long-term durability test will have to wait, but so far, they’re holding up well, and we’ll update this review if anything changes down the line.

Update: After around 30 days using one pair of Zipline’s Blurr poles, one of our reviewers ended up snapping one in half. He did this while doing a shifty and hitting the pole with one of his ski edges. The impact put a fairly clean slice in the pole, and it snapped during his next pole plant. While it’s difficult to really determine when a ski pole failure is due to the pole itself or unusual circumstances, we would recommend the Scott Team Issue pole if maximum durability is your priority. We’re still using three other Zipline poles without any issues, so we’ll continue to use them and update this review if we have any other noteworthy updates (positive or negative) down the line.

 

Zipline Chrome 16.0 Graphite Composite Ski Poles
MSRP: $119
Available Lengths: 85, 90, 96, 102, 107, 112, 117, 122, 127, 132 cm
Shaft Material: 16 mm Graphite Composite
Blister’s Measured Weight (112 cm): 243 grams

Blister's Ski Pole Roundup — 2019
Zipline Chrome 16.0 Graphite Composite Ski Poles

The Chrome version of Zipline’s Graphite Composite Ski Poles are a touch heavier than the Blurr version, but retain the Blurr’s comfortable grip, fairly low swing weight, and good durability. The Chrome versions come in a very shiny finish, so if you want to stand out on the hill, the Chrome 16.0 poles are worth a look.

Adjustable-Length Poles

Black Diamond Expedition 3 Ski Poles
MSRP: $99.95
Available Lengths: 57-125 cm; 62-140 cm
Collapsed Length: 57; 62 cm
Upper Shaft Material: 18 mm aluminum
Middle Shaft Material: 16 mm aluminum
Lower Shaft Material: 14 mm aluminum
Blister’s Measured Weight (62-140 cm): 260 grams

Blister's Ski Pole Roundup — 2019
Black Diamond Expedition 3 Ski Pole

The Black Diamond Expedition 3 pole is one of the more durable three-piece poles we have tested, and it’s still reasonably light and packable. It’s not quite as packable as folding options, but we’ve found the Expedition 3 to be much more durable than those poles. While we’ve found it to be an excellent pole for splitboarding, you could easily use it year-round for a variety of activities. On top of all that, the Expedition 3 comes in at a pretty reasonable price, especially compared to carbon alternatives. If you want a durable and packable pole for all sorts of backcountry pursuits, we highly recommend the Expedition 3.

 

Scott Cascade 2-Piece Ski Poles
MSRP: $129
Available Lengths: 100-125 cm; 115-140 cm
Collapsed Length (100-125 cm size): 93.5 cm
Upper Shaft Material: 16 mm Aluminum
Lower Shaft Material: 14 mm Aluminum
Blister’s Measured Weight (100-125 cm): 253 grams

Blister's Ski Pole Roundup — 2019
Scott Cascade 2-Piece Ski Pole

The Scott Cascade 2-piece pole is a pretty solid adjustable option if you value durability over low weight and / or packability. It obviously doesn’t pack down as small as three-piece options, but at a compressed length of 93.5 cm for the 100-125 cm size, it’s still small enough to toss on the outside of a pack without a lot of the pole hanging off the top or bottom of the pack.

The Cascade’s cork grip has proved to be surprisingly grippy when wearing gloves, and it makes it a very appealing option if you want to use your poles during the summer when you’re not wearing gloves. The grip tape below the cork grip also comes in handy when side-hilling or boot packing when you need to choke up on your grip. It’s not the lightest pole, but for a two-piece pole that you can use all year, the Cascade 2-Piece Ski Poles are worth a look.

 

Black Diamond Whippet
MSRP: $119.95
Available Lengths: 100-140 cm
Collapsed Length: 63.5 cm
Upper Shaft Material: 18 mm aluminum
Middle Shaft Material: 16 mm aluminum
Lower Shaft Material: 14 mm aluminum
Blister’s Measured Weight:

  • Pole only: 330 grams
  • Whippet attachment: 146 grams
  • Total weight (pole + whippet attachment): 476 grams
Blister's Ski Pole Roundup — 2019
Black Diamond Whippet Ski Pole

This year Black Diamond revised one of their most iconic products — the Whippet. If you’re not familiar, the Whippet was created to provide a bit of extra security for people who were out in consequential terrain (e.g., steep, no-fall couloirs). It’s not designed to replace a true ice axe, but for many people, the Whippet’s steel pick provides more peace of mind when booting up or skiing / boarding down steep terrain.

With this revised iteration, Black Diamond seems to have solved one of the primary issues with the traditional Whippet. The new version is modular, letting you remove the ice-axe-style Whippet attachment when you don’t need it. Given that many of us don’t exactly love skiing, hiking, or skinning with a giant metal spike attached to the top of our poles, I think this update is awesome.

The Whippet attachment seats into the top of the pole via metal threads, and taking it off / putting it on takes a matter of seconds. Despite being removable, the Whippet still feels very solid once it’s attached. As a result, I no longer hesitate about bringing a Whippet with me on any days when I’m skiing steep, technical terrain. I just keep the Whippet attachment in my pack, pop it on when I feel like it, and take it off for the hike / ski out.

Even without the Whippet attached to the pole, the Whippet pole is very heavy. So if you plan on using only the pole most of the time, you’ll want to consider that. But having the option of attaching the Whippet when the terrain gets sketchy is a very nice option to have. It’s also worth noting that Black Diamond’s new Traverse WR 2 ski poles are compatible with the Whippet attachment. So if you’re not sure you really need the Whippet attachment but want the option of adding it eventually, you could always buy the new Traverse WR 2 poles and purchase the Whippet attachment later on.

Apart from the Whippet attachment, the actual pole feels burly, I’ve never had an issue with the sections compressing when I didn’t want them to, the extended grip works fairly well when side-hilling, and I love the half-circle powder baskets when I’m poling on firm snow.

If you ski or board in steep, consequential terrain, Black Diamond’s new Whippet makes more sense than ever before.

 

4FRNT Uptrack Adjustable Poles
MSRP: $99
Available Sizes: 105-135 cm
Collapsed Length: 109.5 cm
Upper Shaft Material: 16 mm Aluminum
Lower Shaft Material: 14 mm Carbon
Blister’s Measured Weight: 238 grams

Blister's Ski Pole Roundup — 2019
4FRNT Uptrack Adjustable Pole

4FRNT’s Uptrack poles are light and affordable, making them a good option for budget-minded backcountry skiers. Thanks to their carbon lower shaft, the swing weight on the Uptrack feels incredibly light. That said, I wouldn’t recommend them for resort or 50/50 use as they are more fragile than aluminum poles I’ve used (I broke one of the Uptrack poles after landing directly on top of it during an under-rotated backflip). They’re also not the most compact poles at a compressed length of 109.5 cm. But if you’re not hucking tricks and tend to be a bit more careful with your poles, the 4FRNT Uptrack Adjustable poles offer low weight and a carbon construction in a more reasonable price point.

Share this post:
Ski Pole Roundup — 2019, BLISTER
Ski Pole Roundup — 2019, BLISTER

30 comments on “Ski Pole Roundup — 2019”

  1. I have to say that I’ve become a true believer in the Leki Trigger system. After a couple of thumb injuries early in my skiing life due to improper strap placement, I’ve spent 25 years paranoid about pole straps. Switching to the Trigger system, with the strap integrated into the glove has made me more comfortable and, as a useful byproduct, has really helped me focus on proper pole plant technique, which has helped my skiing immensely.

    I’ll grant they’re spendy and not for everyone, but I can’t imagine going back to pole with regular straps.

    • I was shocked Blister didn’t even mention Leki in their review. I completely agree the Trigger system is the way to go especially if you are tree skiing. I swear by their 14s carbon. They are like skiing with a feather in your hand. Every other pole (especially aluminum) is like carrying around a lead weight. For back country I use Leki’s Peak Vario s, again with the trigger system. On the alpine racing scene, Leki dominates the pole scene.

    • After having broken 2 bones in my hand back in college (40 years ago) my hand would throb after a day of bump skiing. It got worse as I got older as arthritis started to creep in. I sprang for some Leki Triggers when they first came out and said goodbye to hand (and wrist ) pain. The Triggers also help technique by allowing to poles to swing freely without needing to bending your wrist (or even grip the pole)
      I went for the adjustable composite touring model which were quite pricey but I have had them for years now. I lost a basket a few years back and they sent me a pair for free. I broke a replaceable tip early this season and got a replacement pair on line for like $15. I am hard on poles and used to go through aluminum ones every couple seasons. I am sold on the Leki Triggers and would not even consider another option.

    • I really like the trigger poles, gloves(Griffin S) or straps. And my left thumb doesn’t work all that well(trades). Once
      , I popped some rocks that knocked me down, and I wish I had been quick enough to release the grip, so I could slide hand down towards basket, to dig it in, to stop slide.

  2. I don’t really think about poles b/c…they’re poles . But I got some Line Pollards and I find the “”tab” thingy on the grip super handy for when I have to skate around.

  3. Thank you, everyone, for all of the recommendations. We’re planning on doing an annual ski-pole roundup going forward, so we’ll do our best to include more and more options in the future. We’re in touch with Leki now and look forward to seeing where some of their poles fit in.

    • Is anyone besides Leki doing a forward cant to the pole (either through the pole itself, like Leki used to do, or through the handle?

      Scott used to – and I’ve always found it to be a great feature that encourages getting more aggressive down the fall line than a similar straight pole. My sense is that they’re quicker, too, because there’s a little shorter travel on the reach.

      • Hmm, now that you mention it, I’m having a hard time finding any brands that make poles with notable forward tilt. I see some Leki poles that seem to have grips that seem slightly angled forward, but other than that and Black Diamond’s 4-season Alpine Ergo, I’m not seeing much. Maybe some other people here have some options in that category that they like?

  4. I’ve heard the latest Scott Team Issue Ski Poles is having some quality control issues with their SRS system. Something about the new cloth/material/whatever attached to the strap ripping. I’ve been looking for a pair of poles that release, and I don’t like the look of Leki’s straps. Scott Team Issue has been at the top of my list but now I’m having second thoughts. Any others with similar experiences?

    • I have 3 sets of the Scott Team and have had 4 straps break from wear. They sent me some new ones. They also said that I should go through shops to get them but I haven’t found anyone that carries them. I think it’s a known issue and one that’s easy to fix so I assume this is going away.

  5. I had a great set of Komperdell adjustables for about 10 years, then stupidly added them in on a ski sale. Bought a new set of even lighter Komperdells five years ago. I also have Leki triggers (and the trigger gloves) which I like, but not as much as the Ks.

  6. recently, i beat my head against the internet looking for replacement grips. surprisingly few options… know of any good sources ? thanks, steve

  7. I have 3 pairs Swix carbon poles, one pair is 19 years old, the other pair is 14 years old, I keep waiting for them to break but they will not. They also have this yellow plastic thing on the top of the pole that holds your hand in place, I love them. I have two friends with the Leki poles mentioned and they love them and like the Swix they are durable.

    I bought a Pair of Carbon Kompredells last year, I love the swing weight but I have to say the Swix strap is better.

  8. I love my old Kerma Phantoms and Mambas — both carbon, but both have stood up for many, many years of hard use. Is Kerma still making poles these days? If so, are they even imported into the U.S.?

    • I just gave my 20 year old Kerma corrective angle poles to a friend who’s been struggling with pole plant technique. They’re doing wonders for him and I was just wondering the same thing about Kerma. Turns out they’re part of the Dynastar lineup now, along with Look bindings. The corrective angle poles seem to be a thing of the past though, with them sold out on the few sites still listing them.

    • Same here…Have either the old Vipers or Mambas (yellow) and they’ve lasted forever, 15-20 years and still going strong. Wish they weren’t so hard to find, like them much more than the carbon Leki’s I’ve got.

  9. +1 for the J skis poles … look great … very light … very durable … but not unbreakable as J claims.
    Snapped one in half in a freak incident on the lift where it got stuck on something. J stood behind it and sent a replacement set even though it was all my fault. Biggest issue I have is that the matte paint scratches when you look at it.

  10. Like the Leki for their grips as the straps give secure precise flickable feel but big fan of small diameter composite Goode poles as thick composite wall stands up to lots of abuse (I have chop marks that would have killed other composite poles), absorb shock and are easy to flick. After breaking some composite Leki’s I epoxied some Goode shafts in and am now quite happy.

  11. Thanks for this review. Have broken a bunch of poles and bought some “unbreakable” bamboo SoulPoles, which easily broke… Gonna try J poles and Scott’s next, thanks!

  12. Lines poles with the tabs are the best, no straps to lock your hands in resulting in broken hands, plus you can pickup on EVO at the end of the season fo $20-$25. $100 for poles, bunch of pucking dentists!

  13. Love that you guys did a real review of poles. I have the Zipline Chrome 16.0 Graphite Composite Ski Poles and love them. I actually had some black diamonds for almost 7 seasons until the pole strap gave out on me. My dad had an extra pair of these Ziplines so I’ve been using them for a couple months now. One thing I really like is the lightness (obviously), but that it doesn’t have a flimsy feel. A lot of carbon/composite poles have a tendency to vibrate when you pole plant hard which I find obnoxious. These don’t “feel” like a composite pole they feel like a light aluminum pole. AKA sturdy. Also the grips work surprisingly well. I’m actually willing to say they’re easier or at least as east to get grabs with as my old lines poles with grab tabs. The grips on top are just wide enough to sit in the V of your thumb well when you grab, and the rubber keeps them from getting too far away from your fingers.

    …..Note about Leki. I see a lot of people are upset they’re not on here. I don’t think they make bad poles, but one thing to note about the release system is that in freezing wet snow, that trigger can freeze up. Not in issue if you ski in dry places, but PNW skiers might want to take that into note. Also my buddy just snapped a pair pretty easily this season. His ski got kicked out while plowing moguls and he skied out fine but his pole snapped from his ski hitting it. Not something that would happen with an aluminum pole really

  14. Just saying I am not a dentist, or a “pucking dentist”, and I gave up my Lines with grabtabs for Ziplines with their dual material grips which I find much better… my Zips have a much lower swing weight when spinning compared to the Lines, I really didnt think I would care about any difference but I borrowed a pair for a weekend and was surprised at what a difference I noticed and really enjoyed a more free feel,,, apparently David Wise likes the difference also. The next fall I ordered a pair and havent looked back. So if you havent tried Lines and Ziplines side by side, I dont know that you are qualified to call people names who prefer the Zips at whatever the cost. I think that our Blister reviewer missed how good the dual material grip is and how solid and nice it feels compared to Line and Scott poles. Maybe Scott has updated with current product, but I really notice the difference.

  15. I will never understand people who spends more than a 6-pack on fixed-length poles. Just a massive waste of $$ when a pair of abandoned rental poles in roughly the right size will do the trick.

  16. Bought some Scott Team Issue poles based on this review.

    The Strap Release System is excellent at releasing.

    Like any time you are skating across the flats and giving a wrist “flick” at the end of your poling.

    Total fail. Replaced grips with some Lekis.

Leave a Comment