Ski: 2016-2017 Salomon QST 99, 188 cm
Available Lengths (cm): 167, 174, 181, 188
Actual Tip to Tail Length (straight tape pull): 187.2 cm
Stated Dimensions (188 cm): 140-99-122
Blister’s Measured Dimensions: 139-98-121
Stated Weight per Ski (181 cm): 1825 grams
Blister’s Measured Weight per Ski (188 cm): 2024 & 2029
Stated Sidecut Radius (188 cm): 19.6 meters
Core Construction: Poplar + Titanal Layer + Carbon & Flax Laminate
Tip / Tail Splay (ski decambered): 55 mm / 20 mm
Traditional Camber Underfoot: 2-3 mm
Recommended Line: -8.8 cm from center; 84.8 cm from tail
Mount Location: 1 cm behind Recommended Line
Days Skied 7
Test Location: Taos, NM
Flex Pattern:
Hand flexing the QST 99, we’d sum up the flex pattern like this:
- Tips: 6
- Shovel: 7
- Underfoot: 9-10
- Tail: 8
QST: What Is It?
Salomon has shaken up their line of freeride skis, and the new series is called, “QST.”
The first question is, of course, how different these “QST” skis are from Salomon’s current “Quest” lineup of skis (such as the Salomon Quest 105, Q-96 Lumen, and Q-Lab.)
Answer: quite different. And we’ll be saying more about that as we spend more time on the new skis.
About the QST line in general, Salomon says, “Backside skis charging off-piste are not unique. But Backside skis charging also on-piste are… They’re called QST.”
Note: “Bi-Directional” vs. “Directional”
Salomon describes the QST 118 and 106 as “Bi-directional,” and the QST 99 and 92 as “Directional.”
“Bi-Directional” to Salomon means that the skis are optimized “to perform in powder and soft snow, thanks to twin rocker and a Koroyd tip and tail.”
“Directional” is defined as, “performing in all conditions, thanks to AM Rocker, and a wood core extending into the tail.”
What they don’t note as a difference is that the 192 cm QST 118 has a recommended mount point that is only 4.65 cm behind true center, while the 188 cm QST 99’s mount point is set further back at 8.8 cm behind true center.
Re: the QST 99 in Particular…
In Salomon’s catalog, the only thing they say in particular about the QST 99 is: “Charge in any condition.”
So is the QST 99 a “charger”?
That’s a pretty interesting question, actually, and with four days on this ski, I still am working to pin it down.
Update: Our Full Review
You can now read here our full review of the QST 99
NEXT: Rocker Profile Pics
Could the weights have really been off by 200 grams each ski from the claimed weight? That’s pretty substantial.
Note that the “stated weight” provided by Salomon is for the 181 cm model, not the 188 cm model we’re reviewing. (We included that info on the 181 since a number of people will be more interested in it than the 188 cm model.)
So our measured weight is only of the model we’ve been putting time on — the 188 cm QST 99.
Makes perfect sense. Thanks for the clarification.
Have I missed the flash review for the QST 99?
Anyone know of when the flash review will be for QST 99? Looking forward to it.
Is flash review out for qst 99? Have you tested the Rossi Sky HD?
Post the review you bastards!
Hi guys,
I’m looking for a ski around ~100 mm wide to be used as a telemark. I read your reviews of the Salomon QST 99, the Nordica Enforcer 100, the Blizzard Rustler 10 and I’m still wondering which one would be the most adapted !
I ride 50/50 in and out of bounds. I like a stable ski a high speeds, but like it to be playful too…
I’m 180 cm and about 70 kg. Any recommendations?
Thanks a lot,
Jerome
Hey Jerome,
I recommend the Salomon QST or the Head Kore as they are both cheap and created with multi-layer wooden cores of poplar and beech as well as with an outlining of graphene.
They are great skis with many snow tests and other reviews.
I recommend to check them out.