2021-2022 Full Tilt Descendant 100
Available Sizes: 23.5 – 30.5
Size Tested: 26.5
Stated BSL (26.5): 301mm
Stated Flex: 8
Stated Last: 102mm
Blister’s Measured Weight:
- shells, no liners: 1673 & 1681 grams
- stock liners, no footbeds: 226 & 227 grams
- shells + stock liners: 1899 & 1908 grams
MSRP: $600
Test Locations: Porters Ski Area, Craigieburn Valley Ski Area, NZ; Grand Targhee Resort, WY
Days Tested: 9
[Note: Our review was conducted on the 15/16 Descendent 8, which was not changed for 16/17, 17/18, 18/19, 19/20, 20/21, or 21/22, apart from graphics, a name change to “Descendant 100,” and the switch to include Grip Walk soles as standard.]
Intro
If you’ve been skiing for a while, then Full Tilt boots should look familiar since they’ve always just been rebranded Raichle Flexons, with incremental changes and graphics updates.
Always, that is, until now.
The Descendant is the first boot Full Tilt has designed from the ground up, and while the Descendant sticks close to its classic three-piece roots, this isn’t your grandpa’s ski boot. It has several performance updates and a new shell that caters to wider feet.
The Descendant comes in 4, 6, and 8 flex variations, the shells are identical other than graphics, and the tongues can be swapped among models to change the flex. I’ll go into more depth about those flex patterns below.
Fit
In the park skiing community for the last few years, any response to the question, “What boot should I get?” has come in the form of what has practically become a running joke: “Just buy Full Tilts!” Their boots are so ubiquitous that they almost seem to be part of a required uniform for park skiers.
Of course, you shouldn’t “Just buy Full Tilts!” because everyone’s foot is different, and going into the boot buying process with your heart set on a particular model—any model—simply because it was reviewed well or it is popular among your friends is a terrible idea.
Go to the best bootfitter you can find, go through the process, and if Full Tilts work for you, then great.
That said, I can offer some baselines as far as how the new Descendant 8’s fit, especially when compared to Full Tilt’s traditional shell fit.
The Descendant has a stated last of 102 mm, while every other Full Tilt boot has a stated 99mm last.
The toe box is definitely roomier than that of the Konflicts. It is wider and rounder, and doesn’t taper to as much of a point. I appreciate this since I have pretty wide forefeet.
I also have very high arches, and after heat molding the liners at Gnomes Alpine Sports LINK, the boots fit well around my instep and forefoot.
Unfortunately, although I have a reasonably wide forefoot, I have very knobby ankles and skinny heels and calves, so I found the boot to be very roomy in the heel pocket and around my lower calves.
That meant that I had more wiggle room than I would like around my shins and ankles, and heel hold was not optimal. But remember: my feet are not your feet. Take your feet to a bootfitter, and ask him or her to put you into the boots that work best for you.
Construction
The new Descendant series is less of a radical departure from the classic Raichle design, and more of a natural evolution. It seems that Full Tilt’s designers saw many of the issues with the original boots and tried to address them with the Descendant.
Buckles
While the Descendant doesn’t entirely do away with the cable system found on other Full Tilt boots, it does improve upon it. The Descendant’s hybrid buckle-cable system is much more durable and easier to use that the previous system.
Over the course of two years, I have broken 5 buckles off of my Full Tilt Konflicts. The levers that hold the cables in place are prone to opening, catching on something, and snapping, and the lower toe cables are even less durable.
The Descendant uses traditional ski boot buckles that lock into shorter cables that run across the tongue. These buckles are much more durable and easier to adjust precisely than the sliding levers Full Tilt previously used.
The location of the middle buckle has also been tweaked. Instead of running across the tongue and locking into the lower portion of the boot in a notch of the cuff, the buckle now runs from the pivot between lower and cuff, at a 45-degree angle to the ground. Hypothetically, this should help with heel hold, although I personally didn’t notice a discernable difference.
Sole
While several Full Tilt models have had a replaceable rubber sole in the past, the Descendant features a more complete, and well thought out sole. The toe and heel blocks are made of a stiffer rubber than previous FT soles, and should resist wear and tear better. On the flip side, they don’t provide as much traction as a softer sole. I found them to be just a little grippier than a full plastic sole, but I personally prioritize longevity / durability over traction on an inbounds boot like this anyway.
Liner
The Descendant 8 uses Intuition’s Powerwrap Pro liner, and I’m a huge fan of Powerwraps. I’ve found them to be warm and extremely comfortable. I’m currently running Intuition Powerwraps in all my boots, and have yet to ski a stock liner that I like better.
NEXT: Adjustments, Performance, Etc.
Could you explain proper wear of the booster strap? I often wear it under the tounge (touching the liner) and get remarks that it should be over the tounge. The full tilts are odd with the booster under the tounge to be honest, but not sure what is the proper way.
Thanks.
Hey Benjamin,
I’ve always worn the booster on the outside, over the tongue. I do have friends that have experimented with it under the tongue, but they’ve all reverted back to over the tongue as well.
The one thing I have seen done is running the booster around the liner like you described and then running the stock power strap on the outside over the tongue. I’ve never tried that since running the booster over the tongue does the trick for me.
Thanks!
Not liking the lower cuff trend. Spread out that pressure
Tried them on and loved them. A much closer fit to my entire shin & ankle-top more than made up for the shorter height.
How gnarly are your punches and adjustments on your Konflicts? I have the seths right now. They’re a little snug in the forefoot, but I had some Dalbello Boss’s and they were just slop in the toe box. Trying to figure out if it’s worth adjusting my seths or if I should move to the descendant.
Hey Paul,
My Konflicts were sized up, and the liner was really packed out, which meant that I was able to get away without a punch, and instead dealt with some minor foot pain.
I’d say it’s worth a shot to punch the Seths a little, especially if you’re close to fitting. A good boot fitter will be able to give you a much more definite pronouncement though.
Thanks!
I’ve had the Decendant’ for several years now. I wear a regular width shoe but my 5th metatarsal (bone on the side of the little toe ) sticks out to the point of hurting with regular width boots. Hence the Decendant.
I have one other foot flaw, Flat feet. The inside of my arch requires more room. I took care of all my irregularities by having them heat punched and haven;t looked back yet.
I will eventually buy from a shop with a good boot fitter, I just want to get as much info as possible before I commit to a new boot relationship.
I am looking at the rebranded K2 Method Pro which I believe is the same boot as the Full Tilt Descendant (or the K2 Diverge SC which is the same lower shell with a stiffer Flex 10/120 tongue and possibly the same liner).
As Cy said in his initial review, I also have wide feet high arch, skinny calves/ankles and extra space around the heel/ankle is a non-starter if it can’t be fixed. Has anyone resolved how to address extra space around the heel/ankle in a Full-Tilt Descendant or K2 Method Pro or K2 Diverge SC?
Any feedback to that question is greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Gord