Features
The Radium has a full length zipper, two zippered hand warming pockets, (which I use often), and Power Stretch collar and side body panels.
The Radium weighs 439g, which is not much heavier than the similarly warm Patagonia Nano Puff (335g). But 100g is still 100g, and the Radium does not feel super light. It also does not pack down super small. This jacket is meant to be worn, not carried around.
Bottom Line
The The North Face Radium is my go-to active insulator when I’m wearing a shell. It breathes better than anything else on the market that I’ve worn, and it has a great warmth-to-weight ratio for a fleece fabric. If you’re looking for something to wear around town, keep in mind that this jacket will block very little wind. This makes wearing a shell over the Radium pretty crucial.
The North Face Radium doesn’t do everything, but it is very good at what it does. I imagine I’ll wear this jacket on just about every cold tour and alpine climb I do this winter and spring.
First of all, I don’t want you to take this the wrong way. Great review, and it touches on all the important aspects of this type of layer. However, a few things:
“The Radium is one of the most breathable jackets I have ever worn. This jacket breathes as well, if not better, than a thin cotton T-shirt.”
It might be useful to point out that for any fleece, this is true. You can pick just about any fleece on the market, even $10 old navy fleeces, and as long as they aren’t marketed as ‘wind resistant’ or ‘wind proof’, they’ll breath as well as a cotton t-shirt, while providing warmth. But yes, the warmth it provides per weight while still giving full breathability is it’s key.
“Granted, this phenomenal breathability comes at a price. The Radium has almost zero wind resistance. The only places on the jacket with noticeable wind resistance are the panels of power fleece, so I hardly wore this jacket outside without a wind resistant layer over it.”
It might be useful to note that having wind resistance in the locations where the Powerstretch is located is less than ideal. Having no wind resistance across the main body of the fabric, but having wind resistance underneath the arms and alongside the core, isn’t exactly ideal (to put it nicely). In fact, the exact opposite of this jacket fabric layout would be more ideal, in terms of warmth and breathability. It might also be worthwhile to note that Powerstretch is far from noticably wind resistant (if it’s similar to the powerstretch fabrics I’ve worn). It might turn a breeze into something imperceptible, but anything more than that, you’ll definitely be feeling.
“As a rule of thumb, a jacket is as warm as it is thick with loft.”
It’s important to note that this is only somewhat true, and only when dealing with jackets of similar insulation fill. What’s more important is the density of the insulation fill, especially when it comes to down. Total insulation weight of a garment is often more important. When comparing different insulation types, all bets are off. For example, synthetic fill can be a lot more efficient per thickness – thinsulate is designed as the most efficient in terms of thickness to weight (great for gloves and hats). Down is generally very inefficient when it comes to thickness vs. warmth, but is quite efficient in terms of weight vs. warmth. Most synthetic insulations are about as half efficient (if considering 800 down fill quality), but can be noticebly thinner per warmth, especially as the desired warmth increases. Of course, when bringing weight into the equation, they tend to lose points.
“The North Face Radium is my go-to active insulator when I’m wearing a shell. It breathes better than anything else on the market that I’ve worn, and it has a great warmth-to-weight ratio for a fleece fabric. If you’re looking for something to wear around town, keep in mind that this jacket will block very little wind. This makes wearing a shell over the Radium pretty crucial.”
Why would you choose this over an insulated hardshell? Having an insulated hardshell allows you to immediately bypass all insulation when ventilating, which can be quite useful.
In other words, it might be worth stating when you found this type of jacket worth wearing, and when you found it not worth wearing (activities, environments, etc.). This aspect is missing from the review. In my experience, thick warm jackets without much wind resistance have very little utility. For example, when moving strenously, I can wear a highly breathable non-membrane softshell down to ridiculously cold temperatures. While a thin softshell has very limited insulative qualities, the ability for it to trap in warm air generated by one’s body allows it to be very useful to surprisingly low temperatures. A jacket that is warm but traps very little airflow, such as a fleece, seems best used in static environments where the temperatures are quite cold. I can’t think of any, except, perhaps, in the shade while sitting around in a calm environment. Can you explain where you’ve found yourself in such situations, or other situations in which this type of material is best suited?
I guess this is what happens when I have too much time on my hands… hah! Again, don’t take this the wrong way – it’s a great review, and covers most of what you’d want to know, but I think many would like to understand the answer to the question… When would you use this… and when would you not?
“A jacket that is warm but traps very little airflow, such as a fleece, seems best used in static environments”
As an outer layer, sure. I’ve got a couple of bits of high loft thermal pro, and I wouldn’t use either of them as an outer layer if I was outdoors. The weather in the Indian Creek photo looks pretty reasonable though, but maybe that was just a nice product shot for the review…
“Why would you choose this over an insulated hardshell? Having an insulated hardshell allows you to immediately bypass all insulation when ventilating, which can be quite useful”
I’d be looking at this question the other way around. Why would you want to use an insulated hardshell, when a warm fleecy midlayer plus a hard/soft/windshell of your choice is cheaper, more versatile, and perhaps even longer lasting? Dries more quickly and probably holds less water when wet, too.
It also feels really nice ;-)
Hey Brian, thanks for your comments!
I do agree with most of your points, however, on the insulated hardshell front I’m going to have to agree with Ru.
Here are a few of your points that I think are worth mentioning:
1) The breathability of fleece in general is very good. However, the thicker and more dense the fleece is, the greater vapor barrier it will provide. The Thermal Pro High Loft is very low density and relatively thick which makes it far more breathable than a traditional fleece with similar warmth.
2) You are very correct in stating that loft does not necessarily correlate directly to warmth. That however, is a bit out of the scope here. Hopefully I haven’t confused anyone by my wording above… As a comparison to similar (and competing) jackets, I think loft thickness is a great metric to go off of.
3) Insulated hardshells… Oh man, I really don’t like insulated hardshells. Of course, it is all a matter of personal preference. For me however, the versatility of a separate shell and insulation makes it an easy choice to stay away from insulated hardshells. Agree to disagree! I know there are a lot of great insulated hardshells on the market that work for all sorts of activities but for me they aren’t the best.
4) As far as activities and environments, I wear this jacket doing just about anything active. I’ve been wearing it skiing (both touring and resort) a lot recently. I also wore it often this summer on early morning climbing approaches when it’s very cold and calm (often even without a shell). I also find myself wearing it around my house when it gets cold out… I wear the jacket all the time!
Thanks again for your comments, it’s great to hear back from readers, I think a lot of the points you made are very valid and I’m glad you brought them up!
-Sam
How does the Radium compare to Patagonia’s R2 jacket? They seem very similar.
Hey Anon,
Although I have never worm an R2, it looks like a very similar fabric to the Thermal Pro High Loft. I know some of Patagonia’s regulator fleece in the past was made by Polartec so it might be even more similar than it looks…
Other than that, the R2 appears to be a bit thinner judging by the pictures and the weight (R2 = 391g, Radium = 439g). Overall I think both jackets are aiming for similar market space.
I wish I could help you out more!
-Sam
Anon –
The more apt comparison would probably the Patagonia R3 vs the R2. Both the R3 and the Radium primarily make use of Polartec Thermal Pro. The Patagonia’s panels are Polartec Power Dry, TNF’s are Polartec Powerstretch Pro; Sam might be able to comment on the differences between these two as I have no idea (as Jed said in his review of the Lethal Descent Eagle: Sam is an “overall outerwear savant “).
Anyways, average weight is nearly identical (R3 = 445g, Radium = 439g), as is price. Been waffling between these two actually. Given both of these jackets are really easy to find in retail settings, I just need to try both on – my experience is that fit is different enough not just between brands, but also between lines and individual pieces, that which one fits me better may be the deciding factor.
Sam, would this jacket combined with a Gore-tex Active shell be enough protection in windy conditions at -15C or colder (given a good base layer, of course)? Or would I need to go to a more protective shell, maybe Gore-tex Pro?
Hey Jim,
Sorry it took so long for me to get back to you!
Your question is not an easy one to answer. It depends on a lot of things – mainly the level of activity you are doing. In a high output activity, that would easily be enough. In sedentary conditions, it probably isn’t enough.
The decision between Active Shell or Pro should be more based on activity too. Pro is heavier, slightly more breathable and a bit more durable. It also tends to be more expensive. A lot of that decision is based on what you will be doing. Resort skiing and side country? Pro. Touring or cross country? Active. Alpine climbing/mountaineering? Pro. Hiking/Trekking? Active.
I hope that answers your question!
Sam
Thanks Sam, I should’ve been more specific.
Let’s say resort/sidecountry, with 15-minute lift rides in strong winds at -15C, some short hiking and/or traversing.
And of course you’ve nothing more important to do than respond to me!!
Seriously, you and everyone else at Blister are the greatest for all the help you provide.
Jim
That’s the hardest thing in the world to layer for! But I do think the Radium would be a good layering piece for those conditions. I would pair it with a heavier base layer (think Patagonia R1 or similar) and a solid 3L shell (Gore Pro is better choice than active, but NeoShell would also be a good option).
If you tend to run cold, the Radium won’t be enough. At -15C (5F for us americans) I would tend to gravitate more toward down and synthetic baffled insulation. I know at that temp, if I’m skiing resort, I won’t be sweating too much so the decreased breathability from down/synthetic isn’t a huge deal.
For me, the Radium is ideal for -12-10C (~10-15F) conditions with high output like touring. If it gets colder than that, you may need another layer. In -15C touring, I wear the Radium on the way up and then typically throw my Montbell Alpine Light down jacket over my shell when I stop moving to retain heat.
I hope that helps! Layering is a tricky thing because it is very individual and conditions dependent. Let me know if you have other questions!