Tecnica just announced the next generation of their Zero G Tour series of ski boots.
For reference, the Zero G Tour boots slot between Tecnica’s heavier and more resort-friendly Cochise series and their lighter, softer, more uphill-oriented Zero G Peak collection.
Since it was released back in the 2018-2019 season, the Zero G Tour Pro has been a reference boot for us when it comes to touring boots’ downhill-performance-to-weight ratios. We were similarly impressed by the softer, women-specific Zero G Tour Scout W.
Visually, the new 24/25 Zero G Tour boots look pretty similar to the original versions, but Tecnica has made lots of tweaks. The result, according to Tecnica is that the new collection of boots is “lighter, livelier, and more anatomically refined, without sacrificing on fit or performance.”
We should be testing the new boots in the near future, but in the meantime, we’ll cover the details.
For starters, there’s one brand-new model: the Zero G Tour Pro W, which is a women-specific boot with a stated flex of 125. It’ll be available in Mondo sizes 22.5–27.5.
All the Zero G Tour boots feature a tweaked instep design; it’s now reportedly higher and features more of Tecnica’s softer “Quick-Instep” material. The goal there is to make them easier to get in / out of, and more comfortable (particularly for people with higher insteps).
The updated Zero G Tour boots also feature a new last shape. Specifically, Tecnica says the new shape “addresses fit issues from the previous iteration, including the sixth toe and arch support zones, improving both while maintaining the ability to make additional customizations with C.A.S.”
Tecnica also applied some things they learned during the development of their Zero G Peak models. The new Zero G Tour boots implement the “Power Frame” construction first found in the Peak boots, which uses targeted material reinforcements to improve lateral power transmission and reduce the deformation of the lower shell, apparently resulting in an overall flex pattern that is more progressive, while reportedly decreasing weight.
On that note, the new boots are supposedly a bit lighter. Tecnica’s stated weight for the v1 (18/19–23/24) Zero G Tour Pro is 1340 grams per boot for a size 26.5; their stated weight for the 24/25 Zero G Tour Pro is 1290 grams per boot for a size 26.5. That would make it one of the lighter boots out there with a stated flex rating of 130.
For further uphill-performance improvements, the new Zero G Tour boots feature a 10% larger stated range of motion while in walk mode (60° for the new boots vs. 55° on the old ones). Tecnica says they focused on adding this range of motion in the forward direction, for better mobility on steep slopes.
Part of the reason they were able to do this was because of the Zero G Tour boots’ new “double-blocking” walk mechanism. It looks pretty similar to the walk mechanism on the Zero G Peak boots and, in addition to being lighter and creating more range of motion in walk mode, it also increases the forward lean to a stated 14° (listed as 16° when paired with the included liner spoiler).
Some other things aren’t changing a whole lot. The Zero G Tour boots are still 4-buckle, 2-piece, overlap-style shells that feature a full-Vibram-rubber ISO 9523 sole and lightweight cable loops instead of traditional metal buckles.
Below, we’ve listed some of the notable stated specs for the new boots. Aside from the new 125-flex Zero G Tour Pro W and 115-flex Zero G Tour Scout W, Tecnica didn’t list stated flex ratings in their press release; I’d assume the other boots roughly follow the same breakdown as the v1 Zero G Tour boots. For reference, the v1 (18/19–23/24) Zero G Tour Pro had a stated flex rating of 130 and the Zero G Tour Scout’s was 120.
The more affordable Zero G Tour (110 flex) and Zero G Tour W (105 flex) will be carried over for 24/25 and don’t feature the changes outlined above; all the other Zero G Tour boots feature those updates.
2024-2025 Tecnica Zero G Tour Pro
MSRP: $899.95
Available Sizes: 24.5 – 30.5
Stated Weight (size 26.5): 1290 g
Upper Cuff: Co-Injected Carbon Fiber and Grilamid
Lower Shell: Grilamid – Quick Instep
Stated Range of Motion: 60°
Stated Forward Lean: 14° (16° WITH SPOILER)
Power Strap: “40 mm light with Power Lock”
2024-2025 Tecnica Zero G Tour Pro W
MSRP: $899.95
Available Sizes: 22.5 – 27.5
Stated Weight (size 26.5): 1290 g
Upper Cuff: Co-Injected Carbon Fiber and Grilamid
Lower Shell: Grilamid – Quick Instep
Stated Range of Motion: 60°
Stated Forward Lean: 14° (16° WITH SPOILER)
Power Strap: “40 mm light with Power Lock”
2024-2025 Tecnica Zero G Tour Scout
MSRP: $799.95
Available Sizes: 24.5 – 30.5
Stated Weight (size 26.5): 1280 g
Upper Cuff: Co-Injected Fiberglass and Grilamid
Lower Shell: Grilamid – Quick Instep
Stated Range of Motion: 60°
Stated Forward Lean: 14° (16° WITH SPOILER)
Power Strap: “35 mm light velcro”
2024-2025 Tecnica Zero G Tour Scout W
MSRP: $799.95
Available Sizes: 22.5 – 27.5
Stated Weight (size 26.5): 1280 g
Upper Cuff: Co-Injected Fiberglass and Grilamid
Lower Shell: Grilamid – Quick Instep
Stated Range of Motion: 60°
Stated Forward Lean: 14° (16° WITH SPOILER)
Power Strap: “35 mm light velcro”
2024-2025 Tecnica Zero G Tour (carry-forward from 23/24)
MSRP: $699.95
Available Sizes: 24.5 – 30.5
Stated Weight (size 26.5): 1500 g
Upper Cuff: PP (polypropylene)
Lower Shell: PU – Quick Instep
Stated Range of Motion: 55°
Stated Forward Lean: 12.5° (adjustable to 13.5°)
Power Strap: “35 mm light velcro”
2024-2025 Tecnica Zero G Tour W (carry-forward from 23/24)
MSRP: $699.95
Available Sizes: 22.5 – 27.5
Stated Weight (size 26.5): 1500 g
Upper Cuff: PP (polypropylene)
Lower Shell: PU – Quick Instep
Stated Range of Motion: 55°
Stated Forward Lean: 12.5° (adjustable to 13.5°)
Power Strap: “35 mm light velcro”
Flash Review: Our Initial On-Snow Impressions
BLISTER+ members and those who purchase our Digital Access Pass can check out the Flash Review below to read our initial on-snow impressions. Don’t have access? Get our Digital Access Pass to read all of our Flash Reviews and Deep Dive comparisons. Or, even better, become a BLISTER+ member to get that + the best worldwide Outdoor Injury Insurance, exclusive deals and discounts on skis, personalized gear recommendations from us, and much more.
24/25 Tecnica Zero G Tour Pro
We’ve been A/B testing the original and updated versions of Tecnica’s venerable Zero G Tour Pro — here are our thoughts so far on how the new boot compares.
Blister’s Flash Reviews and Deep Dives are accessible to those who purchase one of our paid subscriptions
To get our comprehensive Deep Dives and our initial, unfiltered reports on new gear, become a member and receive many other services, deals, and discounts.
If you’re already a member, please log in.
(If you’re already logged in and a member in good standing and seeing this message in error, please refresh this page in your browser.)
24/25 Tecnica Zero G Tour Pro W
Tecnica recently announced updates to their Zero G Tour ski boots for 24/25, and we’ve been skiing the newest and stiffest women-specific model in the lineup, the Zero G Tour Pro W. Here are some of our initial thoughts on the new boots’ fit and performance.
Blister’s Flash Reviews and Deep Dives are accessible to those who purchase one of our paid subscriptions
To get our comprehensive Deep Dives and our initial, unfiltered reports on new gear, become a member and receive many other services, deals, and discounts.
If you’re already a member, please log in.
(If you’re already logged in and a member in good standing and seeing this message in error, please refresh this page in your browser.)
For reference, here’s the full press release from Tecnica:
The Weight is Over: Tecnica Launches New Zero G Tour Series
In the realm of backcountry exploration, the quest for perfect gear is unending. Today, Tecnica proudly announces the latest breakthrough in backcountry ski boot technology: the new Zero G Tour Series. Esteemed in the backcountry community, the Zero G Tour line has consistently set the standard for excellence. With a steadfast commitment to innovation, Tecnica’s design and testing teams have worked tirelessly, translating countless days of mountain experiences into engineering marvels. The result? A revamped Zero G Tour collection that is lighter, livelier, and more anatomically refined, without sacrificing on fit or performance.
HIGHLIGHTS
New model – Women’s Tour Pro:
A welcome addition to the women’s line-up, the Tour Pro W is a women’s specific touring boot with an unparalleled 125 flex that caters equally to the up as the down.
Improved Instep:
By making the instep higher and adding more Quick-Instep material, the all new Zero G Tour Series boots are not only easier to get in and out of, but are more comfortable in general, with less pressure over the top of the foot.
Anatomical Precision:
Recognizing the unique contours of each foot, the new Zero G Tour Series boots come with a more anatomical shape, providing an impeccable fit right out of the box.
Double-Blocking Walk Mechanism:
Drawing from Tecnica’s experience with the Zero G Peak series, the new Tour Pro and Scout feature a double-blocking walk mechanism. This new mechanism is lighter and offers a wider range of motion, significantly enhancing walkability and forward lean by an additional 1.5 degrees and a 10% increase to 60 degree in range of motion.
The new Zero G Tour Series is a testament to Tecnica’s dedication to excellence and commitment to skiers who are fueled by mountain exploration.
was the last width published?
We haven’t seen a stated last width, but it’s my understanding that the primary fit tweaks were made to the toe box and instep (there was nothing mentioned about width), so I would guess that the last width is still pretty close to the v1 boots’ 99 mm (size 26.5).
We’ll confirm with Tecnica once we receive the boots and post our First Looks.
They responded to my question on IG. same last as the previous model at 99mm. Which means its off the table for me unless I want to try squeeze into the 26.5 instead of the 27.5
Like many boots they are not wide enough to accommodate most skiers I know and blowing them.does compromise shell and largely ineffective anyway.
I have wide, square, flat and short feet and knowing that the Zero G were 99mm I had written them off as not for me. When I went to my bootfitter and tried on different boots and the Zero G felt surprisingly good. I now ski in 25.5 Zero G Scouts (I’m usually size 8 1/2 shoes) and I’m really very confortable in them. It was really not necessary to do any mechanical stretching, “blowing them”, or anything just normal thermofitting.
The only thing that I really don’t like about the Zero G is that they are very hard to put on and take off, so I’m happy to see that’s being addressed.
Other boots I own are the Scarpa Maestrale and the FT ascendant both with a stated last of 102mm. I can honestly say that the Zero G are more comfortable.
Good looking boots. Maybe I’m happier about waiting to buy new touring boots with that instep height increase…
Looks great. I’ll probably upgrade. With all the nice thoughtful improvements, it’s a crying shame they didn’t go for the legit tech fittings. For those worried about the width: I had my yellow vintage ones punched a little for 6th toe and it worked out fine.
Weird they would create a women’s 125. Five points on the flex index seems a bit nominal of a difference to make another boot. Especially in a boot genre that typically leans to the softer side. Most hard charging women I know just go for the current 130. Nice to hear they added room in the areas that needed it. Still think they are missing the segment of the market that wants a 98mm last though. One finger fit touring is the way to go!
We’re definitely curious to try the Zero G Tour Pro W to find out just how similar / different it is from the regular Zero G Tour Pro; they reportedly share the same cuff and shell materials, so we suspect the performance will be quite similar. We should begin testing them within a few weeks.
Not many narrow, 98mm last touring boot are there? Atomic had one of the less wide models, the Backland and added a new boot, the Backland XTD. And guess what? It’s wider. So, although I am in the narrow boot market, I guess the brands just don’t see the demand.
90% weight reduction is pretty decent!
To be honest, as a low volume foot human, this is the only strong touring boot that works for me across the board and I’m sad to hear they are increasing the instep height. When can we say that the high instep population has enough options? Guess I need to stock up on the 23 model.
Zipfit liners can really help those of us who need a little lower volume boot.
We who want a tight fit but have a high instep have waited for this… The shell cutting into the foot getting in and out is not comfy. But when it was on it was perfect for me so hope the overall height is not increased…
Quattro is lower volume and more powerful.
Yup – but thats different weight category (i.e. Cochise alternative, not Zero G). Also having Gripwalk sole – walking comfort is not comparable to the AT sole.
Hope Tecnica fixed the cuff rivets – my Zero G Tour Pro’s have crazy side to side slop. I’ve got new rivets but can’t find a press near me. And agree on the concerns over the increase in instep volume – I’ve already got 1/8-3/16″ bontex shims under my liner. BTW – donning/removing the boot so much easier with a tour wrap than a tongue liner.
And I recently bought the “old” version
And to those complaining about the presumably 99mm last: I have a 105mm last and my Bootfitter made them 106mm wide @ 26.5…
I agree the “recent” zgtp is pretty easy to blow out. My only gripe is the instep-cuff transition which is difficult to change. The new boot promises more room and more soft plastic there. With my favorite Intuition pro tour liners the forward lean isn’t all that upright, so increased lean, didn’t ask for it but hey.
Easily the best boot i have been in (and I abuse it inbounds and tour), and looking forward to the new one.
Re: Rivets on the ZGTPs. Mine are hammered as well. A friend successfully replaced his with threaded Head Raptor canting rivets…
Did he drill them out first? pics?
I do find it disappointing that they did not upgrade the buckles:
-use bolts instead of rivets to attach them
-use a wire bail in the ladder to hold the buckles in place on any notch, not just on the last notch
-use the lever style that has the slider built in
When you add 2 and 3, it means you can leave buckles where you want them, and just flip the lever of the buckle open and closed to go from walk to ski mode. Especially since this is a 4 buckle boot, there are so many buckles to mess with at transition.
I recently sourced a pair of these in Italy. So here is my take after a few runs and some fit assessments, versus the “old” version.
New: more pinky toe room
New: subtly more instep room
New: about 1cm higher cuff in the rear
New: screw hold boot board in place
New: buckle micro adjustments allows veryfew tuns, annoying!!!!
New: a touch stiffer and more pingy flex, more carbon-ish
New: noticably thinner cuff material, especially in the front, yet stiffer. Must be more carbon in there?
New: strap is held by single screw instead of double rivets, making installation of Booster strap easier.
New: Shin bang for me at the top of the boot in the stock liners. Better with Intuitions. Other than that, I could get away fine with the atock liner.
Factory strap is much the same.
Weight, some 60g apart in a 27.5. 1100g per shell w/o liner.
Ski feel is very direct/precise. Mileage still very limited though.
tecnica have also for no apparent reason un-evented the third ladder posistion for the cuff buckles. This requires anyone with bigger legs or thicket aftermarket liners to drill the cuff…wtf?
forgive my spelling on the phone :-)
Summary: Quite a few improvements, liner better than first and similar to 2nd iteration, stiffer, goes down the “light/stiff” path a bit more, as opposed to tour/beef. Feels less like a “one boot solution” than the old one. Fit makes more sense. That said, the old one wore out a fair bit doing that. Elastic power strap would be nice, but a swap is easy. The missing hole for buckle ladder placement is really odd, since the default, longer setting is in use for my slim lower legs, no idea how bigger legs will get away. Expensive for the very conservative construction.