Powder
I was blessed enough to spend two of my deepest days of the season on the Toors Lite, and I jetted out of work early to make sure I got an adequate assessment of their performance in waist-deep snow.
Because of high avalanche danger, I skied most of my powder runs in lower angle, gladed terrain. In these conditions, I was reminded that this is only a 108 mm underfoot ski, and in super deep, light snow, it tended to want to ski in the snow, rather than plane to the top.
The same thing happened when I attempted to really slash and slarve lower speed turns: the ski started to bog down a little. Part of this can probably be attributed to that more forward mount point. While it makes the ski quicker in tighter quarters, it does mean you have less ski in front of you to lean on, so it rewards a more centered stance.
In super deep snow, I would have gotten more float out of something like the G3 Synapse 109, which features a lot of rocker, and prominent taper. Still, I found the Toors Lite to be totally adequate in these conditions, and it is a more versatile ski than the Synapse 109 when the conditions aren’t blower.
Firm Crud
When conditions get chopped up and variable, the low weight of the Toors Lite really start to show, especially when combined with super light boots and bindings. In such conditions, I felt like the stiff flex of the Toors Lite was fighting me. I had a harder time bending the ski into the turn than I had on the heavier—and softer—All Mountain.
That said, for my more centered-style preference, the Toors Lite is still the best ski I’ve found in this weight and waist range. I’ve never gotten along well with the Volkl BMT 109, or the Blizzard Zero G 108. On both of those skis, if you don’t tend to drive the shovels of your skis, their low weight and the rearward mount point will make them feel like you have a super long lever attached to the front of your boots, and I found the shovels wanting to constantly deflect when things get rough.
To be clear, this really is about skiing styles. I suspect that more traditional skiers who prefer a more forward position (like Jonathan Ellsworth), will prefer the BMT 109 or Zero G 108 over the Toors Lite for exactly the reasons that I make the opposite choice.
That said, I’m confident that both Jonathan and I would choose the Toors Lite over the G3 Synapse in variable conditions, or as a one-ski touring quiver. The Synapse 109 is fully rockered and very tapered, and while it’s an incredible ride when things get deep, it skis very short in firm conditions. (The lack of stability of the Synapse 109 had reviewer Paul Forward convinced that the ski was actually broken.)
The Toors Lite strikes a pretty nice balance here. It’s really not the touring version of a super directional charger, but it’s much more versatile than a powder-specific ski. Of course, this is still a very light touring ski, and it feels like one. Skiing long, chopped-up, variable runs is still a chore (again, especially when combined with a very light boot and binding).
Firm Smooth Conditions
I haven’t had the Toors Lite out in a lot of firm and smooth conditions — the closest thing to it was a weird combination of wind-buffed snow up high, with some decent patches of corn, that degraded to terrible slop at the bottom.
But in this semi-smooth snow, the Toors Lite performed very well. It responded nicely when I leaned hard into turns, and I found that I’m able to break the tail loose more easily and consistently than the V-Werks BMT 109. For tight, slarvy, skiing that included some mandatory jump turns on consistent snow, I loved the Toors Lite. I found it easy to pivot and swivel, and it holds an edge well when landing jump turns.
However, when the snow got variable or bumped up, I found myself longing for the Kitten Factory All Mountain due to its heavier weight, and slightly softer flex. It offers a much more stable and forgiving ride in less-than-optimal conditions.
Who’s It For?
In the “Update” section of Paul Forward’s review of the Blizzard Zero G 108, he talks about skiing it inbounds at Alyeska in the morning, then heading out for some skin laps in the afternoon. He was using that ski with the Salomon MTN Lab Boot and Marker Kingpin binding, which definitely contribute to the downhill performance of the Zero G 108, but regardless of the boot and binding, I still wouldn’t consider using the Toors Lite for use both inbounds and out. Instead, I would go for something heavier and more stable—something like the Kitten Factory All Mountain.
We are still living in a world where heavier skis typically perform better on the descent, while lighter skis are much nicer to haul uphill. So you’ll have to figure out your sweet spot when it comes to weight.
The Toors Lite weighs ~150 grams – per ski less than the Zero G 108 or BMT 109, yet maintains a decent amount of downhill versatility.
But a more important factor to me than the weight savings is probably that mount point. I personally don’t like stiff, super-directional skis like the Volkl BMT 109 or the Blizzard Zero G 108. But more rockered, powder-specific tools like the G3 Synapse 109 don’t deliver enough versatility for me to want to tour every day on them. The Toors Lite fills a nice middle ground here—it’s great for the more centered skier looking for a lightweight, everyday touring quiver.
Bottom Line
The Kitten Factory Toors Lite is a very lightweight, fairly versatile touring ski. While there are heavier touring skis out there that offer better variable-snow performance, the Toors Lite pays off on the way up, while still skiing well enough to keep things fun going down. I’ve found myself regularly heading back up for “just one more lap” on this ski, and in my book, any ski that’s both light enough and fun enough to keep me out to the point where I’m skinning home with a headlamp is worth a look.
What, no rocker profile shots?
Nice job Blister Crew, as always. For those in SLC, the Kitten Factory has been doing free Toors Lite demos, mounted with Dynafits, out of their downtown shop. I’m hoping to try them soon for some late season Wasatch spring pow touring
This review makes me want to try that ski.
From the bare specs it also looks comparable to the Movement Conquest – a ski that I will try out in NZ over the next weeks.
I would be interested to see a comparison to or a review of the Conquest here :)
Cy, I still am waiting for those rocker profile pics!
Also, since you’ve skied them all, how about a Toors Lite vs Raven vs Steeple deep dive? Any other touring ski with a mount point around -5 cm that you’d put in the mix?
I was pretty set on my non-pow touring ski to be the Toors Lite this season, but the preview of the Raven has made me reconsider…
Good reminder on the rocker pics!
I like the idea of that Deep Dive! While I personally haven’t been on the Raven (and I need to check the weight on my Steeples), I’m pretty sure that the KF is by far the lightest of the group, and skis like it. It’s certainly less damp and composed than the Steeple, and from what the guys found in NZ, almost certainly less damp/versatile than the Raven. Right now I have Speed Turns on mine and use them as a big days / lots of walking ski, with the KF All Mountain as more of an everyday touring ski. I think that if weight isn’t too big of a deal to you the new Steeple 108 is going to be a great choice, I’ve been blown away at how well my 102’s do in deep snow, as well as more variable conditions. The Raven would be my call if I was going for a slightly narrower touring ski with more of a priority on firm/variable snow.
Just to throw another ski in the mix, the touring ski I’m most excited about for next year is the Sego Bighorn. It’s a jibby twin with a pretty centered mount at a super competitive weight for a touring ski. I have absolutely zero idea how it skis, but on paper it looks pretty ideal and I’m excited to get on it.