Mountain Town Economics 2.0, w/ Jason Blevins, Part 1 (Ep.390)

Mountain Town Economics 2.0, w/ Jason Blevins, Part 1 (Ep.390)
Jonathan Ellsworth skiing at Telluride

Leave a rating and / or review in the Apple Podcast app or on the Spotify app.

This free, 30-second action on your part lets us know you value all the time & energy that goes into producing & publishing the Blister Podcast, and it ensures that we can keep the show going.

How to Leave a Rating / Review on Apple Podcasts

  • Open the Apple Podcast App
  • Go to the icons at the bottom of the screen and choose “search”
  • Search for “Blister Podcast”
  • Click on the SHOW — *not* the specific episode
  • Scroll down to “Ratings and Reviews”
  • Click on “Tap to Rate” and leave us a 5-Star Rating!
  • Below that, you can click Write a Review if you’d like to share a few words

How to Leave a Rating on Spotify

  • Currently, you can only rate a podcast in the Spotify mobile app
  • Navigate to the Blister Podcast show on Spotify (not to a specific episode)
  • Tap the star icon underneath the podcast description and if you like the show, leave a 5-star rating
  • On Spotify, you need to listen to at least one episode before you can rate a podcast.

Today, Colorado Sun co-founder, Jason Blevins, is back to give us the latest on Telluride reopening and the end of the ski patrol strike; we discuss recent developments in affordable housing in Steamboat Springs; we look at various ownership models of ski areas (including what’s happening at Eldora in Colorado); and we ask the big questions: what are the responsibilities of the owners of ski areas, and how do we create more sustainable — and more stable — relationships between ski areas and mountain towns?

Note: We Want to Hear From You!

We’d love for you to share with us the stories or topics you’d like us to cover next month on Reviewing the News; ask your most pressing mountain town advice questions, or offer your hot takes for us to rate. You can email those to us here.

RELATED LINKS:
GetCARV.com
BLISTER+ Get Yourself Covered
BLISTER+ Questions: contact@blisterplus.com
Get Our 25/26 Winter Buyer’s Guide
Discounted Summit Registration for BLISTER+ Members
Non-Member Registration: Blister Summit 2026
Get Our Newsletter & Weekly Gear Giveaways
Galena Gleason’s Article

CHECK OUT OUR YOUTUBE CHANNELS:
Blister Studios (our new channel)
Blister Review (our original channel)

TOPICS & TIMES:
Carv (1:17)
OpenSnow (2:07)
Snowbird (2:38)
Jason in Telluride Last Friday (4:16)
Ski Patrol’s Needs vs Needs of Other Locals (8:37)
Making Patrollers Town Employees? (19:28)
What Are the Responsibilities of a Ski Area Owner? (29:08)
Steamboat Springs Affordable Housing (35:04)
Various Models of Ski Area Ownership (39:22)
What’s Happening in Nederland, CO, w/ Eldora? (47:40)
What Else Should We Know? (50:18)

CHECK OUT OUR OTHER PODCASTS (click each to learn more):

Blister Cinematic Artwork
Blister Cinematic
Mountain Town Economics 2.0, w/ Jason Blevins, Part 1 (Ep.390)
GEAR:30
Mountain Town Economics 2.0, w/ Jason Blevins, Part 1 (Ep.390)
Bikes & Big Ideas
Mountain Town Economics 2.0, w/ Jason Blevins, Part 1 (Ep.390)
CRAFTED

7 comments on “Mountain Town Economics 2.0, w/ Jason Blevins, Part 1 (Ep.390)”

  1. Tax second home and airbnb owners more. Clearly they can absorb it.
    Big kudos to the benevolent Steamboat billionaire… but clearly (again) we can’t rely on that, it’s not their natural tendency. And Blevins is right… the heir or heirs to the benevolent billionaire is unlikely to also be benevolent.

    • Hi, Scott – I certainly wasn’t suggesting that the model of the ‘benevolent billionaire’ was the best model for creating stability. What I was saying is that, if you look around, it sure seems like this is what is actually happening right now. And I’m grateful for those individuals investing in ski areas and mountain towns that actually care about these places. But to ensure a more stable situation, we need new models. Clearly.

  2. And Jonathan, where does your proposal (the town employing patrollers) end? Chuck will start looking to unload lifties, cooks, capital investments, etc. He’ll hold the town hostage to keep bumping his margins, year after year.

  3. It’s federal land. Why not have ski patrol fall up under national Park service? This would be similar to river rafting operations where you have private vendors are permitted to run commercial trips on rivers. But there are river Rangers to monitor safety include the cost of ski patrol in the permit/leasing agreement.

    • That’s an interesting proposal, John. But if the goal is creating a more sustainable — and stable — situation for the mountain towns these ski resorts are based in, given the defunding of national parks that we’ve seen, I wonder if this would actually create a more stable situation?

      That’s the #1 goal here: find the best solution to create a truly-more-stable situation for mountain towns and the many local businesses and residents that depend on ski areas being open. And that means giving visitors to those areas confidence (when they are looking to book their trips 10 or 12 months in advance) that the lifts will be spinning 10 or 12 months from then).

  4. What about city or state employees? Similar to teachers, ski patrol could be paid by the city taxes they could be tenured and then could possibly receive state funded insurance and retirement. Possibly keeping patrollers in an area longer, and if the mountain deserves a certain specialty the pay would be justified. Not all teachers in all districts get paid the same. Just a thought?

  5. I don’t know enough about the exact duties of the traditional north American ski patrol, but there is no such thing in Europe/the alps. moreover the major ski patrol duties (avy mitigation/SAR)is more spread here it seems. the avy mitigation in the alps mostly gets done by the lifties but just if some avy-paths are a danger for the ski areas infrastructure and pistes, and they have to do it by law, in some countries federal law in some state law….but not for freeriding-the mitigation there lies in every riders responsibility … outside of resorts boundaries there is no mitigation besides the measures that have to be conducted to prevent huge avys that are a threat to village, towns, roads, railroads, power lines etc. and is often provided by towns or avalanche committees that are partly subsidized by the state and the country. if the danger rises even higher, often the military helps out with Blackhawks to bomb the slabs or to support and supply cut off settlements with groceries, doctors etc…regular SAR missions in Germany were partly organized by the army (our mountain brigades) as far as air support but they lost the contract with the state a couple of years ago. on the ground SAR missions in the alps are almost entirely in the hands of volunteers of BERGRETTUNG/BERGWACHT etc. but they are professionally trained and closely work together with the professional air rescue operations that get also funded by the state/country but the Bergrettung earns no money (apart from donations) because it is a volunteer thing here, which is highly efficient. In big International mountain towns like Chamonix or Zermatt they got the PGHM (Peloton de Gendarmarie de Haute Montagne) or the AIR ZERMATT which are the best rescue teams on the planet, well funded, prestigious and proud, (pro climbers work there!) …no matter how deep the shit you find yourself in, they gonna get you outta there, by foot, by heel, by mule, by sleds, by dogs.. you name it!

Leave a Comment