1-Ski Quivers: Reviewers’ Selections (25/26)

Blister 2025-2026 Reviewer Ski-Quiver Selections
Luke Koppa skiing at Crested Butte (photo by Taylor Ahearn)
Article Navigation:  Intro //  Luke K. //  Kristin S. //  Mark D. //  David G. //  Jonathan E. //  Paul F.

Intro

Over the past several weeks, we’ve published a bunch of our reviewers’ selections for 5-ski, 4-ski, 3-ski, and 2-ski quivers. Now we’re finally down to the hardest question of all — what single ski would you pick for all the skiing you do?

As we state in all our quiver selection articles, there is no single perfect quiver for everyone. It all depends very much on where you ski and how you ski. So, our selections below should not be viewed as our answer to the question, “What are the best skis out there?”

Instead, these are our reviewers’ personal picks, along with their rationale for why they would choose them.

As always, we’re interested to hear what you’d pick for your own quiver, so let us know in the Comments section at the bottom.

More Ski-Quiver Guidance

For more general suggestions — as opposed to what we personally would pick — check out our Winter Buyer’s Guide. And for more detailed info on the specific skis we discuss in these quiver articles, be sure to click around to read our reviews of the individual products.

If you’d like to get our recommendations for assembling your own ski quiver, then become a BLISTER+ Member, submit your question via the Member Clubhouse page, and we’ll get you sorted out.

Six Questions

For each of our reviewers, we asked them to answer the following questions:

I. What’s your 1-ski quiver for where you ski most (backcountry and resort), and why?

II. If you didn’t do any backcountry touring, what would your 1-ski quiver be for inbounds-only skiing?

III. If you didn’t ride any lifts, what would your 1-ski quiver be for backcountry-only skiing?

IV. What’s your 1-ski quiver for the next 3 years, regardless of location?

V. What skis were most difficult to leave off your list?

VI. What ski do you imagine has the greatest likelihood of making your list, if and when you get to ski it, or get to ski it more?

1-Ski Quivers: Reviewers’ Selections (25/26)

Luke Koppa

(5’8”, 155 lbs / 173 cm, 70 kg)

I. What’s your 1-ski quiver for where you ski most (backcountry and resort), and why?

Ski #1: Armada Declivity X 102, 180 cm + CAST Freetour

Blister 2025-2026 Reviewer Ski-Quiver Selections
2025-2026 Armada Declivity X 102

I suppose this shouldn’t come as much of a surprise, given that this ski has maintained its spot across all my wider quivers, always serving as my daily driver. 

For all the specific reasons I’ve outlined before, the Declivity X 102 just works quite well for me on roughly ~75% of my days at Crested Butte. I’d want a much narrower, tighter-radius ski during the first part of the season, when I’m mostly skiing lower-angle, man-made groomers. And I’d really, really want something wider, heavier, and more rockered when it happens to snow more than ~5”. But I view a 1-ski-quiver decision as a process of finding ‘the least bad option’ for the conditions and terrain I ski most throughout a season, and the Declivity X 102 fits the bill for me. 

Same as in my 2-ski quiver, I’d mount it with CAST’s Freetour system so that I can still skin with this ski for post-work uphill laps at the resort, and a good bit of spring touring in the backcountry. The Declivity X 102 is a great ski for those scenarios / conditions, and it doesn’t hurt that it’s not particularly heavy for its class.

II. If you didn’t do any backcountry touring, what would your 1-ski quiver be for inbounds-only skiing?

Ski #1: Armada Declivity X 102, 180 cm + alpine bindings

Blister 2025-2026 Reviewer Ski-Quiver Selections
2025-2026 Armada Declivity X 102

I spend significantly more time riding lifts than skinning in the backcountry, so my answer to the first question above was already pretty biased toward resort skiing. So, for this one, I’d just swap the tour-able CAST Freetour for a regular alpine binding.

III. If you didn’t ride any lifts, what would your 1-ski quiver be for backcountry-only skiing?

Ski #1: Salomon QST Echo, 181 cm + ATK Freeraider

Blister 2025-2026 Reviewer Ski-Quiver Selections
2025-2026 Salomon S/LAB QST Echo

This decision felt pretty easy for me. 

At a little over 1800 grams per ski, the 181 cm QST Echo comes in at a weight that I personally like for a do-everything touring ski. It’s not the lightest in its class, but I’ll happily deal with 100-200 more grams per ski in exchange for how well the QST Echo skis, relative to much lighter alternatives I’ve tried.

This ski floats and turns really well for its width in deep snow, but I still find it very predictable and enjoyable in pretty much any other condition, aside from true ice. It’s intuitive to maneuver in tricky crusts, but it’s still a lot of fun to carve, even at moderate speeds. I can ski it with a pretty directional style, but it’s not picky in that regard — it remains intuitive from a variety of stances (a big plus in the backcountry, where I seem to end up shifting my balance point more than I might on runs I’ve skied thousands of times at the resort).

With this as my 1-ski touring quiver, I probably wouldn’t be trying to tick off many super steep, high-exposure spring lines on this ski if conditions were brutal, and I’d probably grab my powsurf board on days when the new snow is measured in feet, not inches. 

But for everything in between, I get along really well with the QST Echo.

IV. What’s your 1-ski quiver for the next 3 years, regardless of location?

Ski #1: Armada Declivity X 102, 180 cm + CAST Freetour

Blister 2025-2026 Reviewer Ski-Quiver Selections
2025-2026 Armada Declivity X 102

No change from my answer to question #1. When selecting a ski for my 1-ski quiver at Crested Butte, I had to factor in the potential for everything from icy groomers to the occasional 18”+ powder day. I.e., it’s a great generalist for my preferences. 

I’d be very bummed if I ended up spending months with it in a place that exhibits the extremes at either end of the snow-conditions spectrum, but that’s an inherent reality for this question.

V. What skis were most difficult to leave off your list?

The closest contenders for my non-touring-specific 1-ski quiver include the Salomon QST 94, Stockli Stormrider 95, K2 Mindbender 89Ti, Faction Dancer 2, K2 Mindbender 99Ti, Black Crows Serpo, K2 Omen Team, RMU Apostle 96, Line Optic 96, Icelantic Nomad 100, and Rossignol Sender Soul 102.

I also considered taking a different approach and going with something that was a bit more optimized for when conditions are good. The idea of spending a deep resort pow day on the Declivity X 102 bums me out; it’s definitely not a ski that lets me ski pow and (especially) chop how I want to. So, I considered some skis that I love in soft conditions but that are still fairly versatile; the top contenders were the Dynastar M-Free 112, K2 Reckoner 110, Icelantic Nomad 106 or 112, and the RMU Apostle 106 and 114. 

However, if I’m still going to be spending 100+ days on snow as I have since I moved to Crested Butte, I can’t ignore the statistics. The vast majority of my days are not going to involve deep snow, and I prefer the Declivity X 102 over those skis in most situations outside of powder and soft chop. 

For my touring-only pick, I also considered the Line Vision 104 (a tad less damp than I prefer); Moment Wildcat Tour 108 (not all that engaging in low-angle terrain); Weston Summit Carbon 105 (a bit soft and turn-y in steeps); and the ZAG Slap 104 Lite (not floaty enough on deep days).

VI. What ski do you imagine has the greatest likelihood of making your list, if and when you get to ski it, or get to ski it more?

Frankly, I don’t know of any skis that seem like they’d replace the Declivity X 102. My enjoyment of that ski is the result of a ton of very minor things that it does well (for my preferences). But I’m looking forward to trying all the new 26/27 skis that will start getting announced soon; maybe one of them will be my next favorite all-rounder. 

On the touring side, I also don’t know of many current skis that strike me as strong contenders to replace the Salomon QST Echo. Heritage Lab’s 187 cm BC110 is probably the most interesting to me on paper. But, for a do-everything touring ski, I have historically preferred skis with a bit of camber and tighter sidecut radii to keep things interesting when steeps and fresh snow aren’t on the menu.

1-Ski Quivers: Reviewers’ Selections (25/26)

Kristin Sinnott

(5’8”, 130 lbs / 173 cm, 59 kg)

I. What’s your 1-ski quiver for where you ski most (backcountry and resort), and why?

I went back and forth on this choice several times and came very close to picking a narrower ski this year — after all, many of my current favorite all-mountain skis are in the ~84–93 mm width range. But my goal this season is to ski every day, and with any luck, some of those days will involve fresh snow (at least for the first few runs). With that in mind, I wanted a ski that I enjoyed in average conditions, but that wouldn’t severely hamper my experience when the forecast does deliver new snow.

My longtime favorite, the Wagner Summit 106, was my top choice last year. However, as I mentioned in previous quivers, I haven’t been on it in quite a while, so I didn’t feel confident including it in my 1-ski quiver this year.

When choosing this do-everything ski, I wanted something that would perform well on both soft and firm groomers, be maneuverable in bumps, offer some float for the occasional deep day, and remain composed in chop. I don’t think there’s a single ski I’ve tested that perfectly fits all of those criteria, but the ski that comes closest is the Head Kore 104 Ti W:

Ski #1: Head Kore 104 Ti W, 177 cm + CAST Freetour

Blister 2025-2026 Reviewer Ski-Quiver Selections
2025-2026 Head Kore 104 Ti W

The Kore 104 Ti W is fairly nimble for a 104-mm-wide ski and provides adequate float for occasional powder days. I’ve skied it quite a bit over the past month and have been especially impressed with its performance on groomers, both firm and soft. It’s far from a dedicated carving ski, but I’ve been surprised by how much I’ve enjoyed it, given my usual bias toward narrower all-mountain skis.

II. If you didn’t do any backcountry touring, what would your 1-ski quiver be for inbounds-only skiing?

Ski #1: Head Kore 104 Ti W, 177 cm + alpine binding

Blister 2025-2026 Reviewer Ski-Quiver Selections
2025-2026 Head Kore 104 Ti W

Nothing would change, except I’d swap the CAST system for a dedicated alpine binding. When answering the first question, I mainly focused on the terrain I like to ski at Crested Butte Mountain Resort, so removing backcountry touring from the equation doesn’t affect my choice.

1-Ski Quivers: Reviewers’ Selections (25/26)

III. If you didn’t ride any lifts, what would your 1-ski quiver be for backcountry-only skiing?

Ski #1: Head Kore 104 Ti W, 177 cm + tech binding

Blister 2025-2026 Reviewer Ski-Quiver Selections
2025-2026 Head Kore 104 Ti W

For a dedicated backcountry ski, I think I could still be happy on the Head Kore 104 Ti W. I almost chose the Elan Ripstick 100 W because it’s a fair bit lighter, but the Kore 104 Ti W is a bit more predictable and maneuverable in weird conditions, and I prefer it in fresh snow.

IV. What’s your 1-ski quiver for the next 3 years, regardless of location?

Ski #1: Head Kore 104 Ti W, 177 cm, + CAST binding

Blister 2025-2026 Reviewer Ski-Quiver Selections
2025-2026 Head Kore 104 Ti W

Looking ahead over the next three years, the Head Kore 104 Ti W would still be my choice. Its versatility across a wide range of snow conditions and terrain makes it a dependable option no matter where I’m skiing.

V. What skis were most difficult to leave off your list?

The Wagner Summit 106 was by far the hardest ski to leave off. I even drafted a version of my 1-ski quiver that included it, but ultimately, I feel I need to spend more time on it again before confidently putting it back in my quiver.

VI. What ski do you imagine has the greatest likelihood of making your list, if and when you get to ski it, or get to ski it more?

The Kore 104 Ti W wasn’t a runaway winner for my 1-ski quiver, which leaves the door open for several other options. I’m especially interested in spending more time on the following skis:

  • Head Kore 104 Ti W in a 170 cm length
  • Salomon QST 100
  • DPS Wailer 100
  • Moment Sierra 96 or Sierra 104
  • Moment Bella 101
  • Atomic Bent 100
  • Wagner Summit 106
  • Fischer Ranger 102
  • Zag Slap 104
1-Ski Quivers: Reviewers’ Selections (25/26)

Mark Danielson

(6’2”, 210 lbs / 188 cm, 95 kg)

I. What’s your 1-ski quiver for where you ski most (backcountry and resort), and why?

Probably no touring for me this season in Colorado — just inbounds resort skiing at Crested Butte, Telluride, and Breckenridge — so here’s my pick for that:

Ski #1: Rossignol Sender Free 110, 191 cm + Tyrolia Attack 17 GW

Blister 2025-2026 Reviewer Ski-Quiver Selections
2025-2026 Rossignol Sender Free 110

The Sender Free 110 was a pretty easy choice, because it’s my favorite all-round ski for CB.

This ski works exceptionally well for me in all but the tightest or firmest scenarios at CB. With it mounted about half a cm forward of the recommended line, I can either ski it loosely — pivoting and slashing turns — or with a more serious, precise, and somewhat directional style.

This ski isn’t amazing in firmer conditions, but for a freestyle-oriented 110mm-wide ski, its edge hold is pretty impressive. At the opposite extreme, this ski isn’t wide enough to float my big body in deep powder, and that’s a compromise I must accept.

II. If you didn’t do any backcountry touring, what would your 1-ski quiver be for inbounds-only skiing?

Same setup — I won’t be ski touring this season in Colorado.

III. If you didn’t ride any lifts, what would your 1-ski quiver be for backcountry-only skiing?

For reference, ski-touring hasn’t made up a significant portion of my time on snow, but it’s fun to speculate, so here are my two ideas:

Option 1 (all human-powered)

If the rules here forbid snowmobiles and car shuttles, then I’d choose a lighter setup.

Ski #1: Völkl Katana V-Werks, 191 cm + CAST Freetour 2.0 Pivot 15

Blister 2025-2026 Reviewer Ski-Quiver Selections
2025-2026 Völkl Katana V-Werks

This ski’s minimal taper and long effective edge enable a precise skiing style at higher edge angles, while its full-length reverse camber gives me the option to tap into its looser, more forgiving side at lower edge angles. As a bigger guy, I’d be mindful about avoiding rocks, because the V-Werks carbon construction includes some notably thin areas, but I think this ski would hold up for a full season for me.

Some other fun skis I considered but ultimately rejected as wider than what I want for firmer conditions: Atomic Bent Chetler 120, Dynafit Tigard 114, Volkl Blaze 114.

Option 2 (machine-access allowed)

If snowmobiles and/or car shuttles are allowed, then I’d purely focus on downhill performance and go with the sort of super-heavy setup that I am drawn to for resort laps:

Ski #1: Dynastar M-Pro 108 Ti, 192 cm + Look Pivot 18 + Daymakers

1-Ski Quivers: Reviewers’ Selections (25/26)
2025-2026 Dynastar M-Pro 108 Ti

Our pair of the 192 cm M-Pro 108 Ti weighs ~2475 grams. Its excellent suspension at high speed can make less-than-ideal snow ski a lot more like nice, smooth windbuff. Plus, it provides good support for confident landings. I won’t be doing any flips or spins, so this very directional design works for me.

IV. What’s your 1-ski quiver for the next 3 years, regardless of location?

Same as my pick for the first question:

Ski #1: Rossignol Sender Free 110, 191 cm + Tyrolia Attack 17 GW

Blister 2025-2026 Reviewer Ski-Quiver Selections
2025-2026 Rossignol Sender Free 110

I could (begrudgingly) be satisfied with this one ski at most destinations, aside from a season dominated by frequent deep powder. In the unlikely event that I found myself skiing three straight powder-filled seasons in Japan or Alaska, I’d still have plenty of fun on the Sender Free 110, but eventually I would look for a way to cheat at this game…like maybe add a snowboard, or lose 30 lbs of bodyweight to help these ski float me better.

V. What skis were most difficult to leave off your list?

Dynastar M-Free 112, 190 cm: The M-Free 112 shares some strong similarities with my beloved Sender Free 110. The M-Free 112 skids / slides more smoothly (which suits me better in steeps) and has a more-predictably-catching tip when carving crud at speed (which thoroughly eliminates “over-the-bars” worries and inspires more confidence). However, I prefer how the Sender Free 110 feels when landing onto firm hardpack (it also generally holds an edge better). 

Moment Countach 110, 188 cm: As I’ve written before, for the dynamic conditions of spring and summer, I prefer the impressive versatility of the Countach 110. If I ended up at Mammoth for another one of their big summers of skiing until August, then I’d miss the Countach 110. But I prefer the more damp and stable Sender Free 110 in most mid-winter conditions.

VI. What ski do you imagine has the greatest likelihood of making your list, if and when you get to ski it, or get to ski it more?

At Blister, since we weigh all the skis we test, we often see factory variances in weight. The majority of skis we weigh come in quite close to the average for a given model, but there’s always a chance of a pair that’s an outlier. 

With that in mind, the ski with the greatest likelihood of replacing my 191 cm Sender Free 110 would be a somewhat anomalous, heavier-than-average 190 cm Dynastar M-Free 112. Since these 2 models share many strong similarities, I can imagine a scenario where an M-Free 112 that’s heavier than average would earn my pick over an “average weight” pair of Sender Free 110. But then again, a very slightly heavier pair of the Sender Free 110 could win me right back.

1-Ski Quivers: Reviewers’ Selections (25/26)

David Golay

(6’, 160 lbs / 183 cm, 72.6 kg)

I. What’s your 1-ski quiver for where you ski most (backcountry and resort), and why?

Ski #1: Moment Countach 110, 188 cm + ATK Freeraider 15 Evo / Look Pivot 15 (via inserts)

Blister 2025-2026 Reviewer Ski-Quiver Selections
2025-2026 Moment Countach 110

I’m not a huge fan of 50/50 skis in general — I just want different things from my resort and touring skis on several fronts. Trying to cover all those bases with a single ski involves a lot of compromise.

But compromise is kind of the point here, and I feel pretty good about the Countach 110 as an all-rounder for me. It’s a relatively versatile, wide-ish ski that’s not so heavy that I’d hate touring on it. It has good enough suspension and stability to be a blast inbounds, and I generally find it to be intuitive and easy to get along with in a relatively wide range of conditions.

As for bindings, I don’t love touring on hybrid ones, due to their extra fiddliness and weight, but I’m really not interested in skiing a true touring binding inbounds. So, if it’s not cheating, I’m going to put inserts for ATK Freeraider 15 Evos and Look Pivot 15s (my preferred touring and resort bindings, respectively) and swap back and forth. Those hole patterns play nicely together, and both of those bindings have a bonus for this use case — the mounting screws are accessible without messing with a heel track, so they’re relatively quick and easy to swap back and forth.

If that’s cheating, and I have to stick with a single binding, I’d go CAST Freetour. I’m more willing to compromise on touring efficiency than inbounds performance here, and CAST is my preferred option for a hybrid binding.

II. If you didn’t do any backcountry touring, what would your 1-ski quiver be for inbounds-only skiing?

Ski #1: Heritage Lab RC 116, 190 cm + Look Pivot 15

Blister 2025-2026 Reviewer Ski-Quiver Selections
2025-2026 Heritage Lab RC116

If I’m not doing any touring, I’m going to be more likely to go ride a bike if conditions inbounds aren’t at least halfway decent. With that context in mind, I’m going to go big (somewhat literally) here and take the RC 116. 

It’s admittedly a lot of ski, but my home mountain’s typically high snowfall has me skiing a lot of soft, often-kinda-heavy chop, and the RC 116 is especially good there. I’ll optimize for that, and keep my fingers crossed that the winter delivers enough snow to justify the call.

III. If you didn’t ride any lifts, what would your 1-ski quiver be for backcountry-only skiing?

Ski #1: 4FRNT Raven, 184 cm + ATK Freeraider 15 Evo

Blister 2025-2026 Reviewer Ski-Quiver Selections
2025-2026 4FRNT Raven

The Raven has been in most of my quivers over the last several years, and it’s still my gold standard for a versatile touring daily driver.

IV. What’s your 1-ski quiver for the next 3 years, regardless of location?

Ski #1: Volkl Mantra 102, 184 cm + CAST Freetour

Blister 2025-2026 Reviewer Ski-Quiver Selections
2025-2026 Volkl Mantra 102

For this question, I’m assuming that I’m travelling around a bunch; in that scenario, I’m probably riding chairs more than I’m going touring (given less local knowledge and fewer established touring partners). So, I’m going with a slightly narrower, firmer-snow-oriented ski than I’d opt for at home in the PNW.

And for that — especially if I need this ski to last three seasons of daily use — I like the Volkl Mantra 102. I can have a good time on it in most conditions inbounds, and while it’s far from an ideal touring setup, it’ll get the job done from time to time.

V. What skis were most difficult to leave off your list?

There are a ton of skis that I’d be sad to not have in my quiver, but I feel pretty good about my call of the Countach 110 if I only get one. The ski that came closest to unseating it is the Volkl Katana V-Werks, but the looser, slightly more damped Countach 110 won out.

VI. What ski do you imagine has the greatest likelihood of making your list, if and when you get to ski it, or get to ski it more?

I bet there’s a version of the Folsom Giver that I’d really like for a do-it-all ski. The Line Vision 114 could be promising (though I suspect I’d probably want something a bit heavier / with better suspension for the inbounds portion of the program).

1-Ski Quivers: Reviewers’ Selections (25/26)

Jonathan Ellsworth

(5’10”, 180 lbs / 178 cm, 81.5 kg)

I. What’s your 1-ski quiver for where you ski most (backcountry and resort), and why?

Ski #1: Wagner Summit 106, 186 cm + Shift2 13 Binding

Blister 2025-2026 Reviewer Ski-Quiver Selections
2025-2026 Wagner Summit 106

For the 3rd year in a row, I’m going with the Wagner Summit 106. Though, as I write this — and thinking about all of the firm groomers I’ve enjoyed skiing this year on sub-80mm-wide skis, and also thinking of my cat skiing trip next month — the idea of having a single ski to use for everything … feels exactly like owning only one spoon and no fork.

Still, with all the skis I’ve reviewed over the past 3 years, I think the Summit 106 + Shift2 binding is an excellent, all-purpose setup.

II. If you didn’t do any backcountry touring, what would your 1-ski quiver be for inbounds-only skiing?

Ski #1: Nordica Enforcer 104, 185 cm + Tyrolia Protector PR 13 GW Binding

Blister 2025-2026 Reviewer Ski-Quiver Selections
2025-2026 Nordica Enforcer 104

Same as last year. I’m actually a bit surprised that this wasn’t a harder decision. But for me, the Enforcer 104’s blend of weight, stability, good suspension, good edge hold, and good maneuverability still currently comes closest to hitting the bullseye for me.

III. If you didn’t ride any lifts, what would your 1-ski quiver be for backcountry-only skiing?

Ski #1: Salomon QST Echo, 189 cm + ATK Freeraider 15 EVO

Blister 2025-2026 Reviewer Ski-Quiver Selections
2025-2026 Salomon S/LAB QST Echo

I’m cheating here a bit. Because I still haven’t skied the 189 cm Echo, but if I’m only skiing the backcountry, I’m going to roll the dice here by going a bit longer and gaining more surface area in the hopes of getting a boost in flotation for bigger pow days. And I’m totally fine gaining a little bit more weight here. Plus, the backcountry skiing I do rarely involves super narrow couloirs, so I’m not at all concerned about the longer length becoming a hindrance.

IV. What’s your 1-ski quiver for the next 3 years, regardless of location?

Ski #1: Wagner Summit 106, 186 cm + Shift2 13 Binding

Blister 2025-2026 Reviewer Ski-Quiver Selections
2025-2026 Wagner Summit 106

Mostly, I think this question makes me more annoyed with each passing season. I really like spoons and forks and knives.

V. What skis were most difficult to leave off your list?

Nothing, really. But if I only skied the backcountry, I think the 4FRNT Hoji would be a good substitute for me for the Echo 106.

And if I was willing to go a bit more firm-snow oriented than the Nordica Enforcer 104, then the Volkl Mantra 102 would be the easy answer for my resort-only 1-ski quiver.

VI. What ski do you imagine has the greatest likelihood of making your list, if and when you get to ski it, or get to ski it more?

I’m not sure, but I have a feeling that I’m bound to get on something this season that might knock the Enforcer 104 off its perch?

1-Ski Quivers: Reviewers’ Selections (25/26)

Paul Forward

(6”, 195 lbs / 183 cm, 88.5 kg)

I. What’s your 1-ski quiver for where you ski most (backcountry and resort), and why?

Ski #1: Heritage Lab BC120, 193 cm + inserts for Moment Voyager and Marker Jester Pro

Blister 2025-2026 Reviewer Ski-Quiver Selections
2025-2026 Heritage Lab BC120

I still spend 12+ weeks per year guiding heli skiing, and then I spend any other free time I have trying to ski tour around Turnagain pass, so those are two major use cases that are somewhat at odds with each other in terms of the skis that work best for them.

That said, the BC120 is a remarkably good all-round powder ski, and it happens to weigh under 1900 grams in my preferred 193 cm length. I can’t think of a better ski for a combination of heli- and human-powered skiing in Alaska. I’d be pretty sad during days at Alyeska resort when I want to rail groomers, but the BC120 does ok at the resort on powder days and “day after powder” days. As for bindings, I just can’t get behind hybrid binding systems and would rather fiddle with inserts than compromise on the up and down.

II. If you didn’t do any backcountry touring, what would your 1-ski quiver be for inbounds-only skiing?

Ski #1: Folsom Giver 110, 192 cm, Marker Jester Pro

Blister ski-quiver reviewer selections 2024-2025
Folsom Giver

For these purposes, I’m going to assume that “no backcountry touring” also means “no heli skiing,” so I’ll pick one ski that will get me through a winter at Alyeska. This year, so far, I’d be pretty sad with this choice, given that it’s not particularly exciting on piste. But I think that, as we get more snow and the north face of Alyeska opens, I’d be pretty happy to have this versatile 110 in the car.

III. If you didn’t ride any lifts, what would your 1-ski quiver be for backcountry-only skiing?

Ski #1: Heritage Lab BC120, 193 cm + Moment Voyager

Blister 2025-2026 Reviewer Ski-Quiver Selections
2025-2026 Heritage Lab BC120

Again, I’ll assume that I have to cover heli and touring as I did in the first question, so my ski wouldn’t change. I can’t think of a better all-round backcountry ski for my style of skiing in Alaska right now.

IV. What’s your 1-ski quiver for the next 3 years, regardless of location?

Ski #1: Salomon QST Echo 106, 189 cm + inserts for Moment Voyager and Marker Jester Pro

Blister 2025-2026 Reviewer Ski-Quiver Selections
2025-2026 Salomon S/LAB QST Echo

What little time I’ve spent on the QST Echo 106 is enough to make me feel like it would be a pretty good ski to travel the world with. It’s not too light for some inbounds thrashing, nor is it too heavy for big touring days, and the shape works pretty well for both.

If I ever get to try them, I’d consider the ATK Hy binding for this application, but in lieu of that, I’m taking two pairs of bindings in my ski bag and inserts in my skis.

V. What skis were most difficult to leave off your list?

It would be pretty hard to swallow a whole season on a pair of powder skis because I just love inbounds skiing on groomers, moguls, etc., and I’d greatly miss some skinnier resort skis, such as the Black Crows Mirus Cor, or a full-on Slalom ski.

VI. What ski do you imagine has the greatest likelihood of making your list, if and when you get to ski it, or get to ski it more?

I really need to spend more time on some other 95-110mm-wide skis on the market. Hopefully, I’ll get a chance this season.

31 comments on “1-Ski Quivers: Reviewers’ Selections (25/26)”

  1. Back in the day, younger and stronger, I only skied on the Rossignol Giant Slalom skis. They were so forgiving but could bang the bumps, shush the chutes, and cruise full throttle on groomers or chopped up crud. I demoed many skis, but found nothing better than the Rossi’s for me. First pair in 200 cm, worked up to 207cm- too long, last pair at 201cm. So much fun!
    These were not shaped.
    So what is a good ski for me know that the glory days are over?
    Thanks, Mike in Montana

  2. This is both my favorite and hardest quiver thought exercise… I’d probably have to go with the Deathwish 104 and Shifts. I could see a Woodsman 100 in a 50/50 layup taking this slot, but that’s a theoretical possibility and I know I get along with the Deathwish in a lot of conditions. In the hybrid binding space I’m interested in the ATK Hy Free but the shift 2.0 has been tried and true for me so far

  3. Nearly impossible exercise for someone who skis November to July most years in the PNW haha. We get everything from feet and feet of meniscus-shredding heavy powder to corn and ice after skinning/hiking up for 6k feet. I’d probably opt for 90-98 1600-1700g skis and put inserts on them. Skis that come to kind are the Head Kore 94 W or Liberty Radian 92s. But honestly I hope to never need a one ski quiver haha

  4. The fact that there are no skis under 102 on this list, especially considering the current conditions in CO, is difficult for me to comprehend…

    • Because … everybody on our team will be skiing well into May or June. Across a whole spectrum of conditions. And in a number of different places?

      The fact that every year people find it difficult to comprehend how & why our reviewers select *their own personal* quivers – even when we *then explain the rationale* … that’s the only thing I find difficult to comprehend.

      (Also, in our buyer’s guide, we do share our selections for skis we’d choose for various places, quantities of snowfall, types of snow, etc. These are, as the intro always states, our personal selections for how & where we ski.)

      Let’s please try this again: feel free to share with us what *your* 1-ski quiver would be, given where you ski and how you like to ski. I’d love to read more comments like that. Or, if instead you’d like us to help you select *your* 1-ski quiver for how and where you like to ski, just become a Blister member and we’ll be happy to assist.

  5. For those of us who ski at places that don’t get hundreds of inches of snow per season, these quivers are rather fanciful. Would be nice if you got reviewers to select a OSQ assuming <= 100 inches of annual snowfall.

    • Please see my comment above. And I’ll repeat: feel free to share with us what *your* 1-ski quiver would be, given where you ski and how you like to ski. I’d love to read more comments like that. (Also, in our buyer’s guide, we do share our selections for skis we’d choose for various places, quantities of snowfall, types of snow, etc. These are, as the intro always states, our personal selections for how & where we ski.)

      Or, if instead you’d like us to help you select *your* 1-ski quiver for how and where you like to ski, just become a Blister member and we’ll be happy to assist.

  6. Rather difficult and not practical real world questions here (I gotta say the same, strange decisions here width-wise imho!)…a ski for all use cases regardless every aspect like conditions/place/space/steepness/lifts etc..?..hm probably JP’s old Armada Declivity 98 184 which was a 96 in 176, quite the Swiss army knife….superduper in bulletproof and fun AF in moguls, float was okish, 1830 grams in the 176, still a bit loose, best steep skiing tool there was at the time, super reliable and trustworthy metal ski. maybe quiver inserts with haute route and a stance 16. other options here Line Prophet 100, Sick Day 104 or K2 Coomback/Coomba.

    if NEW skis are required then maybe a ranger 102 in 183 with inserts or the new J skis Prophet thing. if I am bored I would go more biking in winter somewhere in the desert or fly out to a fancy destination in the southern hemisphere to go birdwatching!

    Satisfying my ski quiver must be. More skis you must buy. The force cannot be ignored!

  7. Sorry Strive 16, my favorite heelpiece, good geometry, better for carving than pivots but still nice for 3d snow, bit lighter still lozzo metal , good for small quivers…would be quite the shit if the first cast thing that if I can remember correctly was operated with Salomon Sth’s would come back …I bet lots of customers would buy it again with the new tech.

  8. This is a tough exercise, so I’ll give it a try :-). I am fortunate to have a five-ski quiver and am in the process of bumping it up to 6 or even 7. thinkin salad cutlery and deserts :-D.

    @Paul: I have written to you several times in the comments on this topic, but I am not sure if you have seen any of them yet. If not, I am convinced you have missed the best AK powder touring ski, the Ronin 122. I have a very light-built exclusively for powtouring. But Jonno can build it heavier and make it work as one ski quiver for AK Heli and Touring. So that would be my AK Heli and Touring call. But I’m in Switzerland and not in AK, so I will make some different calls.

    1-Ski quiver overall: Blackcrows Atris with ATK Hy, but it is a close call beside some other skis. Further, this is only the case because my beloved Enforcer 104 Free is no longer in production. But I will hang on to it as long as it is in good shape.

    No touring: Blackcrows Atris with Strive (I’m not picky with bindings, Pivots, and Tyrolia have also worked for me). My focus in the Alps is a ski that carves well on groomers and still floats in powder. We have hardly any moguls in our resorts these days, and we also don’t ski cut-up snow that much.

    Only touring: That is an easy call, my beloved Folsom Giver in SRC with the Freeraider 15 EVO. My focus is ski touring, and I tour throughout the winter, spending a lot of time in powder with my touring ski. This is the best ski I have ever been on for all conditions that you can encounter in the backcountry. But since it is a custom ski, it feels a bit like cheating. Alternatively, I would go for the Nordica Unlimited 104 (it is still in production and available in Europe). This is an amazing touring ski that would also work as a 1-ski quiver for someone who likes to do occasional on-piste skiing but prioritizes touring.

    One last thing I would like to write here. I have been testing a couple of skis in my life, and preferences are a matter of taste. I share some of your reviewers’ tastes and mostly understand your choices and recommendations. The only category I struggle to agree with you on is touring skis (Except for Paul). The Hoji is a great ski, and although I have never tested it, I am optimistic about the Renegade. The only ski I have ever hated is the Raven in powder. This ski feels like a rocking chair and has sent me flying over the handlebars multiple times. And this has never happened to me with any other ski. So I totally don’t get why you all liked this ski so much. Luckily, you seem to be shifting your focus to the QST Echo, which I am confident will work for many more people and various backcountry conditions, including powder.

  9. I’m curious what people might pitch as 1-ski quivers for the East Coast. For me it’s been a Nordica Enforcer 93 (it’s an old one) for a while now. They are really tired, but they did manage to last me through the years of paying for my kids daycare, so hopefully I can spend some of that daycare money on skis going forward.

    The Enforcers have been a really well-rounded ski so my guess is that a fresh pair of Enforcer 94s would be a huge improvement. I think that ski does a good job of surviving conditions that would really be best suited for race skis, but then thriving in east coast chop off the side of the trail, or bumps and tight trees. I’m also looking at options like the Blizzard Anomaly 94 or something from a smaller company like 4FRNT MSP 91. What are other people are buying as a 1-ski quiver to “survive” the hard pack and tear up softer east coast conditions (which often still include some hardpack)?

  10. Love that inserts got mentioned!
    My one ski would be Down Countdown 104L with insets for alpine Tyrolia Attack MNC and for touring ATK Trofeos w brake.

  11. Nice to see the V-Werks Katana getting a mention in 2026. I absolutely love that ski, even if one of them did fillet my thigh to the point where I needed 3 layers of continuous internal sutures and 50 skin staples over the top (an unforeseen side-effect of combining lazy technique on the day, obsessive edge maintenance, and the ultra-thin profile)

  12. Per Jonathan’s desired format…:-)

    K2 Mindbender 89ti. Whitefish. Our last 5 seasons have not been filled with frequent big powder dumps. Our best fall lines face south, so we DO reliably get astounding corn.

    So I’ll trade occasionally having not enough float for the rest of the performance suite of the MB89ti — which carves astoundingly well for what it looks like when leaning against the wall, and is noticeably quicker than it’s 99ti big brother.

    Cheers!

  13. I agree east coasters, a one ski quiver should be only as wide as the mounting screws on your bindings.

    Out of all the skis I have put time on I would have to go with the k2 Mindbender 108ti. Harder days are manageable, and I would have a hard time giving up the stability and float for deeper days. We don’t really have groomers here so despite my love of carving, as a percentage of ski time, they are not a priority.
    I suspect I would go with the Mindender 99ti if I had a chance to ski it.

  14. OK, my second post here ever, tho’ I read them all. I just gotta’ chime in
    I retired my widest-ever ski, Atomic Atlas 115, my knees just couldn’t deal with them on hardpack, and because I skied them in Las Lenas I couldn’t part with ‘em so they’re on my wall.
    Narrowest to widest:
    Brahma 82 (two pair)
    Stance 96 (‘24model)
    Bonafide (two pair, ‘15 and ‘20 models and 98 under boot…….my favs’, best ski ever)
    QST 106 (‘23 model, pretty sure)
    Cochise 108( ‘15 model, the blue and orange one. 2nd best ski if feeling frisky)

    Hope everybody gets fun turns in this year.

  15. I love spoons and forks and knives – love it Jonathan, and feel my own quiver is testament to also liking soup spoons, tea spoons, ladles, butter knives, fish knives, dessert forks…you get the picture.

    The dreaded one ski quiver question, for me it would be my Fischer Ranger 102FR, does well enough on piste and in the soft stuff and would only struggle on the deep days. Could mount with a hybrid binding for the few touring days I do. Head Monster 98 would also work, but would be better on piste, not as good off piste though better in heavier snow, would not want to drag it uphill though (wuss).

    Of currently available skis that I have skied, could be BC Justis or maybe the Atris, Ranger 96? Struggling a bit here, so need to get out and try more skis!

  16. One additional question: One thing that struck me reading through these quivers is the number of reviewers using inserts to mount multiple bindings on the same skis. Are you all using Binding Freedom or something else? Do you find that shops are willing to do multiple sets of inserts like that?

    I use Binding Freedom on all but my racing skis (for example I have my Dancer 4s set up with inserts on both the progressive and classic lines because I went back and forth a bit) but I do all of my own work and therefore assume full responsibility for the consequences. I haven’t experienced any problems, but I’m super careful to seal around each insert with slow-cure epoxy etc.

    I’m wondering how shops react when you propose putting 16 inserts into each ski or whatever. I haven’t tried to get a shop to do anything like that lately, but some of them at least used to be pretty conservative about that sort of thing.

    • When I say “these quivers” I’m including all of them (1-ski to 5-ski). I realize there aren’t as many inserts in the 5-ski quivers for obvious reasons :-).

    • I’ve used both Binding Freedom and Quiver Killer. I slightly prefer QK (mostly because I don’t find the screwdriver slot on BF to be very useful, but it makes them harder to seal well) but both work well.

      I mount my own stuff too, so no experience asking a shop to do it.

      • That screwdriver slot mates to a pair of ears on Binding Freedom’s insertion bit. I agree that it’s completely useless otherwise, and it does indeed make it hard to see all the way up to topsheet level.

        SVST (Binding Freedom is a “gateway brand” that they use to disassociate their main, shop-oriented product line from their DIY stuff) would probably argue that the topsheet and the metal and/or glass layers under it aren’t vulnerable to water intrusion, so it’s OK to just seal up to the bottoms of those slots. Like you I’m way too paranoid for that and as you say it’s a hassle to seal.

        Our of curiosity what jig system do you use? I have a “real” ATK jig (courtesy of Hagan) which is awesome but $$$$, and I’ve tried the Jigarex but found it to be too flimsy and fiddly. I ended up building my own jig system from 2040 extrusion rails and a collectino 3D printed inserts that slide onto the rails for centering, clamping, spacing above the ski, and each binding’s toepiece and heelpiece (with 8 mm press-in drill bushings from McMaster Carr). I’m bummed that there aren’t more broadly available quality systems – it shouldn’t take an ex-ME with spare time, a 3D printer, and tech income to obtain a quality jig.

  17. Tom, 6’2″, 175#, Baker/Sun Peaks

    Some seasons I seek out an interesting ski to learn something new. It’s never the most practical, it can feel quite awkward the first few times out, but by mid season I’m adjusted and enjoying a new dimension to skiing I haven’t experienced before. This year I’m working on playful short turns on a GS: The Atomic Redster G9 RS(M) (183/R24).

    4 days so far. First couple were a little weird. But the last time out I hit a perfect rain day at Baker (no crowds, concrete turns to soft spring snow) and had a blast.

    Of course “GS” and “Baker” oddly shouldn’t be in the same sentence. If I had to choose a practical ski for the conditions, I’d pick the Fischer Ranger 84 for the reasons:

    1) I tend to like narrower skis.
    2) Baker powder is mostly gone by 10:30.
    3) 84 is a good width to avoid high-siding. Baker snow tends to grab sub 80 skis throwing the pilot down the hill, sometimes violently.
    4) Has anyone flexed these skis?!?! They are completely different than the rest of the Ranger line. For a ski with no metal, it is surprising stout: Spar-88, old Brahma, maybe even Monster 83 levels.

    Love the quiver picks!

  18. Hello! Question for Luke: Could you explain why you prefer the QST 94 over the QST 100 in a one-ski quiver? What does the Revolt 101 lack to be a contender for that spot in the quiver?

  19. Rustler 10 192cm….you guys need to review this length. It’s very different than the 186, just like the Dynastar MFree 108 is in comparable lengths.

Leave a Comment