2023-2024 Moment Commander 92

Ski: 2023-2024 Moment Commander 92, 182 cm

Available Lengths: 170, 176, 182, 188 cm

Blister’s Measured Tip-to-Tail Length (straight-tape pull): 180.6 cm

Stated Weight per Ski: 2050 grams

Blister’s Measured Weight per Ski: 2063 & 2094 grams

Stated Dimensions: 131-92-113 mm

Blister’s Measured Dimensions: 130-91.5-112.5 mm

Stated Sidecut Radius (182 cm): 18 meters

Measured Tip & Tail Splay (ski decambered): 50.5 mm / 20.5 mm

Measured Traditional Camber Underfoot: 8 mm

Core Materials: poplar/beech + titanal (2 layers) + carbon fiber composite

Base: carbon infused sintered UHMWPE

Factory Recommended Mount Point: -9.9 cm from center; 80.4 cm from tail

Blister reviews the Moment Commander 92
Moment Commander 92: 23/24 Top Sheet
Review Navigation:  Specs //  First Look //  Rocker Pics

[Editor’s Note: In the interest of getting you information sooner on some of the products we’re reviewing, we’re posting here some of our measured specs and manufacturer details, and will update in the future. Take a look, and let us know in the Comments Section below what questions you’d like us to answer.]

What Moment says about the Commander 92

A few years ago, a metal-laminate ski wouldn’t have made it past the drawing board—let alone a sub-100mm-waisted hardpack destroyer with dual-metal laminates and vertical-sidewall construction worthy of a race room where all the techs sound like the Terminator.

But a few years ago is basically another lifetime, and the fact is, nothing goes better with corduroy than titanal and tight dimensions. We’ll be the first to admit that we’ve always had a need for speed and the prospect of putting out a hard-carving frontside ski the way we believe one should be built has us pretty excited. At a svelte 92mm underfoot, the Commander 92 is a true ripper like we’ve never made before.

We wanted a ski as capable of snapping you from turn to turn on bulletproof boilerplate as it is easily dumping out of a max-G arc before you lose your breakfast. The result is a completely new shape and profile built for faster engagement, supreme composure, and maximum support. Pair that with a painstakingly refined sidecut and flex profile and add a touch deeper tail rise than your average frontside ski, and it’s all shockingly compliant and accessible. That said, this ski is made for carving and it’s all business, so unless you want a full-fledged charger—which some of you certainly do—we strongly suggest you size down. You’ll still find it plenty supportive. Trust us.

The Commander 92 is stiffer, damper, and a hell of a lot quicker than anything we’ve cooked up before. And while taking it off-piste is definitely possible—even enjoyable in the right conditions—we won’t feed you a line like, ‘Destroys groomers but also dominates the entire mountain!’ That’s bullshit.

At Moment we build with a purpose. Not a boardroom-approved target demographic. In our minds, the Commander 92 is as close as we ever want to get to a pure carving ski, and frankly, that’s what we plan to do with it ourselves. Turn fast and kick ass. Maybe even rock a headband, turtleneck, pair of Vuarnets, and a cigarette if we’re feeling it. It’s that kind of vibe, and hopefully, you’re here for it.

If not, that’s cool—just don’t be surprised when you get your doors blown off halfway down Headwall by someone who is.

Flex Pattern

Here’s how we’d characterize the flex pattern of the Commander 92:

Tips: 7.5-8
Shovels: 8.5
In Front of Toe Piece: 9-10
Underfoot: 10
Behind the Heel Piece: 10-9
Tails: 8.5

This ski is notably stiff from tip to tail, but not quite as stiff as our pair of the wider Commander 102.

Stay Tuned…

We received the Commander 92 for testing this season. Stay tuned for updates, and let us know of any questions you have regarding this new ski.

2023-2024 Moment Commander 92, BLISTER
Share this post:

Rocker Pics:

Full Profile
Tip Profile
Tail Profile
Rocker Profile - Decambered
Tip Profile - Decambered
Tail Profile - Decambered
23/24 Top Sheet
Previous slide
Next slide

6 comments on “2023-2024 Moment Commander 92”

  1. Very interested to hear more. I just bought a pair of 23 declivity in 180 length (got for about $380) that I have not touched yet because I am waiting to hear more about these first. These seem to be stiffer and I am mostly curious to see how they perform off-piste in tighter areas (East Coast).

  2. Excited for the full review! Luke- would love to hear your feedback on the 182 length for your size given Moment’s comments in the product description about sizing down (like you I ski 184s in the DW and WCs ) and also the more rearward mount point compared to the more forward mount points of the other Moments mentioned above. Cheers!

    • Yep, I’m curious about those things as well. So far, the 182 cm Commander 102 feels like the right size for me, but I’m curious to see if I feel like the 182 cm Commander 92 might be longer than I need / want, given that I’ll likely be using that sort of ski on firmer, shallower conditions where I have less need for the flotation and big-turn composure of a longer ski.

  3. I have a pair of these. Just got back from Park city Utah skiing for four days. These commander 92s are my favorite skis I’ve ever been on. I am a predominantly frontside skier. These skis are damp and absolutely rip groomers. so fast and so much fun to ski! Headed to Vail in two weeks and can’t wait

Leave a Comment