Ski: 2022-2023 Moment Wildcat, 184 cm
Available Lengths: 164, 174, 179, 184, 190 cm
Test Location: Mt. Crested Butte, CO
Days Skied: 11
Blister’s Measured Tip-to-Tail Length (straight-tape pull): 181.9 cm
Stated Weight per Ski: 2190 grams
Blister’s Measured Weight per Ski: 2163 & 2166 grams
Stated Dimensions: 141-116-131 mm
Blister’s Measured Dimensions: 143.1-116.4-133.6 mm
Stated Sidecut Radius (184 cm): 25 meters
Measured Tip & Tail Splay (ski decambered): 67.5 mm / 66.5 mm
Measured Traditional Camber Underfoot: 7 mm
Core Materials: aspen/ash + carbon & fiberglass laminate
Base: sintered 7500 series UHMWPE
Factory Recommended Mount Point: -5.65 cm from center; 85.3 cm from tail
Boots / Bindings: Tecnica Mach1 LV & MV 130, Atomic Hawx Ultra 130 S GW / Salomon Warden 13 MNC
[Note: Our review was conducted on the 21/22 Wildcat, which returned unchanged for 22/23, apart from graphics.]
Intro
From the Bibby to the Blister Pro and Wildcat, this ski has had a handful of names over the years (see this article for the whole story). But one thing that has remained the same is its relevance here at Blister — since even before Blister existed, we’ve been skiing, referencing, and talking about this ski.
At the start of the 18/19 season, the Wildcat’s construction changed, and the ski got notably lighter, resulting in some tangible changes to the ski’s on-snow performance. But for 20/21, the Wildcat received another construction update and got some of its weight back, with reports that it had returned to its “playful charger” origins. These changes carried over to 21/22 and 22/23, and we’ve been spending a lot of time on the latest version of the ski. But before we get into our Full Review below, let’s go over some details about the latest Wildcat.
What Moment says about the Wildcat
“Don’t get it twisted: the Wildcat is first and foremost a powder ski. Just because you’ve heard time and time again about people who got a pair for deep days and now use them as a daily driver, or talked to friends who bought them for their playfulness but found them surprisingly composed at speed and sturdy in chop, we’d advise you not to take that to the bank. While we don’t disagree, we won’t go so far as to recommend them as your daily driver either.
The Wildcat got loose from the pow ski box we put it in on day one, and clearly it’s not coming home anytime soon. They say when you love something, let it go, and if that means letting people discover how frustratingly versatile, agile yet dependable and strong the Wildcat is in condition no powder ski should be subjected to — how it can rail hardpack like a baddy, stomp switch landings in the park, and surf pow all in the same lap — then who are we to try and keep it under lock and key? It is a Wildcat for chrissakes, not some domesticated feline.
The original heavyweight is the origin of the phrase ‘playful charger’ — it floats and slashes like a dream but don’t get it wrong — it has plenty of horsepower, so when the pedal hits the metal it keeps on giving and begs you for more.
But just so we’re up front about it: it’s a pow ski. Nothing more, nothing less.
At this point though, if you haven’t experienced just what the Fatcat can do well it’s time to put up or shut up.”
Shape / Rocker Profile
Since the OG Moment Bibby was released well over a decade ago, the shape of this ski hasn’t really changed (apart from 13/14–14/15, when it bumped up to 120 mm underfoot, but afterward, returned to the same silhouette).
The Wildcat has a bit of early taper at the tips and tails but, compared to many modern skis this wide, the Wildcat’s tips and tails don’t taper all that much. To be more specific, the Wildcat has notably less tip and tail taper than a lot of the other skis that we’d classify as “playful pow skis,” and its degree of taper falls more in line with more traditional, directional skis.
But where it differentiates itself from those more directional skis is in its rocker profile. The Wildcat has a lot of tip and tail rocker, and a fully twinned tail that has basically as much splay as the tip.
In today’s market, the Wildcat’s mix of minimal tip and tail taper and substantial tip and tail rocker stands out more than ever. And this could certainly help explain the Wildcat’s unique feel on snow.
Flex Pattern
Here’s how we’d characterize the flex pattern of the Wildcat:
Tips: 7-7.5
Shovels: 8-9
In Front of Toe Piece: 9-10
Underfoot: 10
Behind the Heel Piece: 10-8.5
Tails: 8-7
This flex pattern is very similar to the older Wildcats / Bibbys, with one notable exception. The 20/21–22/23 Wildcat’s tips and tails are notably stiffer, and you can actually see that the core profile of the newer Wildcat is thicker near the ends of the ski, relative to the older Wildcats / Bibbys. The previous Wildcat was already quite stiff through most of the cambered portion of the ski, and the latest version maintains that while also being stiffer in the rockered portions, making for an overall quite strong ski.
Compared to other freestyle-oriented pow skis, the Wildcat remains one of the stiffer options out there.
Mount Point
At -5.6 from true center, the 184 cm Moment Wildcat has a mount point that is pretty similar to many other freestyle-oriented powder skis out there. Despite that, a wide variety of our reviewers get along really well with the ski, including those who tend to prefer pretty traditional, directional skis.
Weight
The Wildcat’s weight has been a hot topic over the last few years, and was one of the most notable changes when the latest 20/21–22/23 iteration was released. The last (18/19-19/20) version of the 184 cm Wildcat weighed in at about 2056 grams, while this latest version of the 184 cm Wildcat comes in at around 2165 grams per ski. The 11/12 Bibby came in at 2190 grams in the 184 cm length, so this newest Wildcat is quite similar in that regard.
For reference, here are a number of our measured weights (per ski in grams) for some notable skis. Keep in mind the length differences to try to keep things apples-to-apples.
1625 g Moonlight Cruiser 50/50, 186 cm (21/22–22/23) – stated weight
1710 & 1744 Atomic Bent Chetler 120, 184 cm (18/19–22/23)
1808 & 1809 Line Pescado, 180 cm (16/17–22/23)
1833 & 1894 Head Kore 111, 184 cm (22/23)
1863 & 1872 Atomic Bent 110, 188 cm (22/23)
1873 & 1878 Line Vision 118, 183 cm (20/21–22/23)
1870 & 1895 Faction La Machine Max, 186 cm (20/21–22/23)
1885 & 1914 Moment Wildcat Tour, 190 cm (21/22-22/23)
1897 & 1913 Majesty Vanguard, 188 cm (20/21)
1895 & 1906 Folsom Trophy Carbon, 188 cm (18/19–22/23)
1910 & 1941 Scott Scrapper 115, 189 cm (17/18–20/21)
1921 & 1927 Fat-ypus D-Sender, 184 cm (20/21-22/23)
2006 & 2063 Elan Ripstick 116, 193 cm (20/21–22/23)
2013 & 2099 Moment Wildcat, 184 cm (18/19–19/20)
2019 & 2051 K2 Mindbender 116C, 186 cm (19/20–22/23)
2024 & 2031 Line Outline, 186 cm (19/20–22/23)
2034 & 2052 Blizzard Rustler 11, 188 cm (17/18–21/22)
2043 & 2046 4FRNT Inthayne, 188 cm (18/19–22/23)
2060 & 2075 4FRNT Hoji, 184 cm (21/22-22/23)
2062 & 2080 Whitedot Ragnarok ASYM, 190 cm (19/20–21/22)
2081 & 2115 Faction Candide 5.0, 183 cm (18/19–21/22)
2083 & 2137 Blizzard Hustle 11, 188 cm (22/23)
2105 & 2185 Head Kore 117, 189 cm (19/20–20/21)
2125 & 2134 Kye Shapes Metamorph, 185 cm (19/20–21/22)
2136 & 2174 K2 Reckoner 122, 184 cm (20/21–22/23)
2149 & 2158 DPS Alchemist Lotus 124, 191 cm (17/18–20/21)
2163 & 2166 Moment Wildcat, 184 cm (20/21-22/23)
2173 & 2204 4FRNT Renegade, 191 cm (19/20–22/23)
2174 & 2187 Moment Wildcat, 190 cm (18/19–19/20)
2212 & 2215 Armada ARV 116 JJ, 185 cm (17/18–22/23)
2222 & 2278 Prior CBC, 184 cm (17/18–22/23)
2237 & 2315 Salomon QST 118, 192 cm (19/20–20/21)
2240 & 2250 Volkl Revolt 121, 184 cm (19/20–22/23)
2250 & 2280 Movement Fly Two 115, 184 cm (19/20–21/22)
2259 & 2279 Black Crows Anima, 189.2 cm (20/21–22/23)
2280 & 2286 Icelantic Nomad 115, 191 cm (19/20–22/23)
2318 & 2322 Line Blade Optic 114, 186 cm (22/23)
2329 & 2344 Blizzard Spur, 189 cm (20/21–21/22)
2341 & 2357 Dynastar M-Free 118, 189 cm (18/19–22/23)
2343 & 2360 J Skis Friend, 189 cm (19/20–21/22)
2346 & 2351 Nordica Enforcer 115 Free, 191 cm (17/18–22/23)
2416 & 2468 Liberty Genome, 187 cm (17/18–20/21)
2438 & 2480 DPS Foundation Koala 119, 189 cm (19/20–20/21)
2438 & 2492 Rossignol BLACKOPS 118, 186 cm (16/17–22/23)
2561 & 2585 Kye Shapes Numinous, 189 cm (19/20–21/22)
2700 & 2703 Armada ARG II, 187 cm (19/20–21/22)
Now, onto how the Wildcat performs on snow:
FULL REVIEW
From the Bibby to the Wildcat we know today, Moment has made some changes to this ski over the years, but never strayed super far from the model that we really, really liked. And while we’re eager to get more time on the 190 cm Wildcat (stay tuned), we’ve been skiing the 184 cm Wildcat since last winter and it feels like a very exciting return to form for fans of the original version.
(Side note: if you want to try this ski for yourself — including a reported new length of 196 cm! — you’ll be able to at the 2023 Blister Summit.)
Powder
Dylan Wood (5’10.5”, 155 lbs / 179 cm, 70 kg): At 116 mm wide, you’d be hard pressed to find anyone who doesn’t consider this a powder ski. And in powder, the Wildcat certainly feels at home.
Whether pointing it down the fall line or making slower, more frequent, pivot-y turns, the Wildcat offers good flotation. Its tips do a pretty good job of staying above the snow surface from a more centered or slightly forward stance. When you need / want to shut it down and throw the Wildcat sideways, though, it’s pretty happy to do so, and has a fairly loose feel in deep snow. This certainly isn’t the surfiest ski in powder, but it never feels locked into a turn or straightline in pow.
With its relatively long radius and stiff flex pattern, the Wildcat doesn’t feel like it bends or deforms much in powder. This means that it doesn’t offer best-in-class flotation in deep snow, given that its tips and shovels don’t flex that much, but the Wildcat feels strong and predictable in powder. Whether you are pointing the ski straight downhill through or making aggressive slashes in untracked snow, the Wildcat never feels hooky or unpredictable — a very appreciable trait.
While I would categorize this as a pow ski, I’d also say that its flotation isn’t the best for a ~115 mm wide ski. Rather, it’s impressively versatile when the fresh snow gets skied out.
Luke Koppa (5’8”, 155 lbs / 173 cm, 70 kg): Agreed. Our reviewer up in Alaska, Paul Forward, has often said that the Wildcat / Bibby isn’t the best for its width when it comes to pure flotation, and while I’d definitely agree with his take and Dylans, I also like to point out that, for pretty much all the resort skiing I do in Colorado, the Wildcat floats just fine. It doesn’t get bogged down easily, will plane up with some speed, and remains very easy to throw sideways at a moment’s notice. It’s not what I’d pick for mellow glade skiing in ultra-deep snow, but what makes it really stand out is how it performs after all the fresh snow has been cut up and tracked out.
Soft Chop
Dylan: The Wildcat / Bibby has been known as a chop-destroying ski, and after gaining some weight in 20/21, this latest Wildcat seems to carry that torch well.
Stiff and fairly heavy, the Wildcat does a good job of blasting through piles of chop. There are certainly some even more damp and composed options out there (e.g., the 186 cm Rossignol Blackops 118), but the 184 cm Wildcat differentiates itself by offering impressive stability while still feeling fairly quick and maneuverable.
It also feels versatile in terms of the styles it can be skied with. Point it right through piles of cut-up snow, and the Wildcat does a good job of staying on track and not bucking you around very much. But if you’d prefer to pop, slash, and pivot around through chop, the Wildcat is happy to do that as well. Some skis that are notorious for being chop-destroyers can feel sluggish and “dead” when you’re not pushing your limits in terms of speed and aggression, but the Wildcat feels more energetic and lively than it does damp and smooth — without getting deflected a whole bunch in soft chop. We’ve historically referred to the Wildcat as a “playful charger,” and this newest version most definitely still fits that mold.
Luke: As soon as we heard that Moment had built the Wildcat a bit heavier, following its lighter 18/19–19/20 years, soft chop is where I really wanted to test the new ski. And it did not disappoint.
While I haven’t skied the 184 cm length of the original-construction Bibby / Blister Pro, I can confidently say that the latest Wildcat feels a lot more stable than the lighter, 18/19–19/20 version of the ski. Even though it’s not super heavy, the latest Wildcat stays very composed when skiing hard and fast in soft chop. As Dylan noted, there are some skis that feel smoother and/or calmer when really nuking through cut-up snow (especially if it’s denser / more set-up), but the Wildcat remains in the upper echelon of powder skis when it comes to composure in soft chop. I can’t think of many scenarios when I was skiing soft chop on the Wildcat and found myself thinking it was lacking in composure.
However, as Dylan noted, the Wildcat is still fairly easy to ski. Yes, it’s pretty stiff and fairly heavy, so it doesn’t feel super engaging at very low speeds. But it is still very easy to release and slash around (which is very useful when you need to shed speed), and despite being a bit heavier than the 18/19–19/20 version, the latest 184 cm Wildcat doesn’t feel all that sluggish. So not only did Moment return it to its chop-busting ways, but they also maintained the versatility that made the original so fun — impressively stable, but still quite maneuverable and playful.
Moguls, Trees, and Tight Terrain
Dylan: While it’s not the loosest / surfiest pow ski on the market, the 184 cm Wildcat still feels comfortable and capable in tight terrain. As I mentioned earlier, this ski offers very respectable stability, but it doesn’t come in at an extremely hefty weight. In tight terrain, its moderate swing weight helps keep this ski feeling quick and maneuverable where heavier pow skis can feel sluggish.
Whether you’d prefer to slide and slarve around or let the ski run down straight down the fall line, the Wildcat feels comfortable in both situations. It is fairly easy to pivot through tight terrain, though not particularly forgiving of backseat skiing — its stiff tails can certainly stand you up and punish you for poor technique. Softer pow skis (e.g., Armada ARV 116 JJ) can be more forgiving in tight terrain and big moguls, but the Wildcat is pretty maneuverable while also being pretty strong and powerful, catering to a wide variety of skiers.
Luke: Yep. As I noted above, the Wildcat isn’t what I’d choose if I knew I was going to stick to mellow-angle, tight terrain. Its stiff flex pattern, fairly heavy weight, and long sidecut radius all cater to more aggressive skiing. But especially in somewhat steep terrain with lots of bumps or trees (and ideally, soft-ish snow), it feels quite maneuverable — particularly when you consider how composed it feels at speed in more open terrain. If you can keep some momentum going, the Wildcat feels fairly agile for its size.
Groomers
Dylan: With a stated sidecut radius of 25 meters for the 184 cm length, it could be assumed that the Wildcat is not a fun carver and takes tons of speed to get on edge and arc across the fall line. In reality, I found the Wildcat to be a surprisingly enjoyable carver.
Sure, it’s not the greatest pow ski for those who really prioritize enjoying the inevitable groomer on soft snow days (the Line Pescado is probably the best in this regard), but the Wildcat can still be tipped over into GS turns and enjoyed on groomers. Its stiff forebody and moderately heavy weight also help it blast through piles of pushed-around snow that are common on groomers during a pow day.
Luke: Groomer performance probably isn’t a big priority for most folks when they’re looking for their next pow ski, but I agree with Dylan in that the Wildcat is very predictable on piste. It’s not a ski that makes me eager to really lay over turns on groomers, but for its size and class, the Wildcat offers very good edge hold and stability on smooth, firm snow. Especially if you find yourself on a wide, long, steep slope that lends itself to bigger turns, the Wildcat can be a lot of fun to carve.
Firm Crud
Dylan: I wouldn’t say the Wildcat stands out for having excellent suspension — there are heavier skis that outperform it when it comes to how smooth / plush / damp they feel. Still, when the pow gets skied out or you come across some scraped-off sections, the Wildcat’s versatility continues to shine.
The Wildcat offers good edge hold, remains maneuverable on firm snow, and still stays quite stable when the fresh snow firms up. This makes the Wildcat a good option for folks looking to take out a wide ski on days after a storm, or other situations where you might not always be skiing deep and/or soft snow. On days where it isn’t necessarily a pow day but a rope drop might occur somewhere on Mt. CB, I often took out the Wildcat — it let me enjoy soft, deep, untracked snow, but also didn’t feel very out of place when there was no more fresh snow to be had.
That being said, in really nasty conditions, such as refrozen crud, bulletproof ice, etc., a narrower, heavier ski (e.g., Volkl Mantra 102) feels much smoother and more enjoyable. The Wildcat strikes me as a great option for the following 2-3 days after a storm, but not exactly a daily driver for those high-pressure, mid-winter days (Moment makes the narrower Wildcat 108 and Wildcat 101 for that).
Luke: Dylan provides some useful context here — while we’ve emphasized the Wildcat’s versatility, it’s still a ~116mm-wide ski, and no ski of that size is ever going to feel amazing in really firm, rough snow. The Wildcat feels pretty damp and stable when skiing firmer crud, but piloting a ski that’s this wide, stiff, and heavy through firm, bumpy snow still takes a toll on my knees and legs.
As far as suspension goes, I’d say the latest Wildcat is quite good for its class, but it doesn’t feel like some ultra-plush ski that absorbs every little impact and vibration. Think of the Wildcat as a mountain bike with its suspension set up for racing — optimized for support and composure at speed, not maximum comfort while taking it easy.
Still, what I appreciate about the Wildcat is that it remains predictable just about everywhere. It doesn’t completely erase every little inconsistency in the snow, but it also doesn’t behave erratically when the soft snow runs out, which can’t be said of all (most?) skis this wide. So, as Dylan noted, I view the Wildcat as an excellent option for storm days and the few days that follow where you’re looking for stashes but skiing a fair bit of firm / cruddy snow to get there.
Playfulness
Dylan: We often call the Wildcat a “playful charger,” and I think that’s a good categorization of the ski. Both freestyle-oriented and more directional skiers have reason to check out the latest Wildcat, though there are definitely more playful options out there.
To be clear, the Wildcat is playful in many aspects. It skis switch very well, feels balanced in the air, and is a fairly surfy / loose powder ski. But there are lots of even looser powder skis out there, and the Wildcat is also pretty stiff, making it less ideal than something like the Line Outline for butters and presses.
Luke: The Wildcat seems very well suited to the freestyle-minded skier who’s primarily focused on bigger terrain, rather than making the most of smaller, lower-speed hits. Its mount point, shape, and rocker profile are all well suited to getting in the air, spinning, and skiing switch, but its strong flex pattern and long sidecut radius keep it from feeling super engaging at slow speeds. So I wouldn’t get the Wildcat if you’re looking to butter and slash every little roller, but if you want something that feels composed in chopped-up in-runs and runouts, while still feeling balanced in the air, it’s an excellent choice. It’d be one of my top picks if I were to enter a big-mountain freeride competition, but not for something like jibbing around in the forests of Japan.
Who’s It For?
Dylan: As I mentioned above, the Wildcat can be enjoyed by more directional and more playful skiers. It also feels quite versatile for a powder ski, and definitely doesn’t feel limited to just untracked snow. So I think the demographic of who should be looking at the Wildcat is quite broad.
It is stable and strong, allowing you to ski quite hard in powder, chop, and even crud. While it doesn’t have the smoothest, most bump-erasing suspension out there, it does bring some liveliness to the table that heavier skis can sometimes lack. And it certainly isn’t only meant for charging — it offers great maneuverability for how stable it is, keeping it enjoyable in tighter terrain. Plus, its powerful platform is also a freestyle-friendly one, and those who like to throw tricks and slash around could find a lot to like about the Wildcat.
That being said, skiers looking for something on either end of the spectrum have better options — there are more stable and game-on powder skis out there, as well as many more easygoing, forgiving, and playful ones.
Luke: Looking back at our reviews of the original Bibby / Blister Pro, much of what we said there remains true for the latest Wildcat. The OG versions’ ability to work for such a wide range of skiers was a big part of why we were such big fans of it; this latest Wildcat continues that trend. It’s one of the more stable skis in its class, but can still be skied in a very playful manner.
I’ll echo Dylan in saying that the Wildcat wouldn’t be my top recommendation if you (1) want the absolute best flotation, (2) prefer an ultra damp, smooth, borderline “dead” ski, or (3) are looking for an extremely loose, forgiving, nimble pow ski. But if you’re looking to make the most of your resort pow days, even after the fresh snow is all chopped up, it is an excellent choice that does a lot of things well.
Bottom Line
“It’s back.”
That’s pretty much how we could sum up this review, at least for those who were familiar with the original Moment Bibby. With the latest Wildcat, Moment has returned this ski to its original “playful charger” ways. It’s a powder ski that’s still a whole bunch of fun in chop, with impressive stability at speed, but in a package that’s also quite maneuverable and well suited to a more playful skiing style.
Deep Dive Comparisons
Become a Blister Member to check out our Deep Dive comparisons of the latest Wildcat to see how it compares to the previous Wildcat, Moment Bibby, DPS Koala 118, Salomon QST Blank, Nordica Enforcer 115 Free, Rossignol Blackops 118, Prior Northwest 116, Black Crows Anima, Dynastar M-Free 118, Line Blade Optic 114, J Skis Friend, Volkl Revolt 121, 4FRNT Renegade, Elan Ripstick 116, 4FRNT Inthayne, Atomic Bent Chetler 120, Line Vision 118, Season Forma, Line Outline, K2 Reckoner 112, Icelantic Nomad 115, & Head Kore 117.
I am losing track here: Was the change made for 21/22 or as it sounds in Moments description 20/21?
They updated the construction for 20/21, and then that same construction carried over for 21/22. So the 20/21 and 21/22 skis are essentially the same.
hah until I read Luke’s reply to your comment I was confused too thinking moment flagrantly lied to me when they said the 21/22 wasn’t changing except graphics, which caused me to buy the 20/21 they had in the shop.
But they didn’t lie and I love the ski.
FYI to people reading – Jonathan talks about liking the way older heavier Bibby->Wildcats: for me at 170cm 140lbs expert focusing on tight tree skiing the 174 wildcat was clearly too short and unstable, 179 perfect, 184 a bit too heavy / long.
I was also really surprised when I skied the 179 wildcat the day after the 179 wildcat 108 at how much more stable the wider wildcat was, and that it gave up far less maneuverability than I expected
You guys get a 190 too for Jonathan?
Super curious what size I should be looking for in this ski; I’m 5’9 (175cm) and 180lbs. Currently skiing the Head Kore 111 184cm for pow and soft snow days and find they’re too stiff for my liking and hard to get them around in tight spaces without high speeds. I’m an aggressive/advanced skier. Should I be looking at the 184cm or 179cm? Cheers!
5/8 160# and i love the 184, considered even going to 190 but it has larger dimensions overall by 2mm, moment advised against the upsize.
Hey Josh. 184 for sure. You’ll find that you might want to mount a little rearward. Coming off the Kore you’ll want a little more up front. FYI. I’m same size as you and have the 108 in 190 and don’t think it’s too big. They measure a little shorter also.
Could y’all do a review of the Wildcat 101s? There’s a lot of talk around them and we’d love to know what you guys think.
When’s the full review coming out?
5-6 200 lbs. 48 years old. But pretty fit and strong advanced skier. Trying to decide between 179 and 184. Using this mostly as powder ski in quiver ? Suggestions ?
Hey Jeffrey, we could use some more info. Shoot us a note in the Personalized Gear Recommendations section of the Blister Members’ Clubhouse, and we’ll get back to you as soon as we can.
I’m 6′ 155lbs, strong advanced skier. currently on soul 7 180 and Nordica enforcer 177. debating between 184 and 190 but afraid 190 will be too much in the trees. never had a designated pow ski before and would like something that floats, turns sideways quickly and can be nimble for trees, but also handle chop (I suppose everyone is looking for this ski?). like to ski fast but tight trees are my weakness. racing east coast background but ski mostly mt hood now. also been looking at 4frnt renegade, and qst blank. sorry lot to unpack here. thanks! also intrigued by black ops…
Luke mentioned ‘not my first choice for forest jibbing in Japan’. Not so much the jibbing, but what *would* be your choice for Japanese forests?
Cheers!
Something fatter and softer.
Ghost Train….
Curious to hear how the Wildcat 108 compares to the women’s Bella? I haven’t seen a review on that ski in a long time, maybe this is the year?!
They changed the core from aspen / ash to poplar / ash for 22/23!
Super excited about that new 196cm size… definitely puts these on the map for me now. Will the deep dive be updated to compare to other similarly sized skis? Have any of you guys even gotten a chance to try them yet?
Do you guys think you’ll get your hands on the newly dropped 196 WC? I’m one of those who always inquired about a longer WC as I have the sender squads and the 190 WC but feel like the 190 certainly has some room to move up to 194ish
It’s going to be available to demo at the Blister Summit
Any remarks on the 196s?
Look forward to hearing about the longer lengths, not because they would work for me but keen to hear where it stands in Jonathan’s affections now it’s heavier again. The review above feels positive still, but not as much of a standout ski as previously (at least that’s how I interpreted it) Wonder whether time is catching up with it or rather other ski manufacturers have been improving their offerings incrementally
Do these ski firm snow better than On3p Woodsman 110, even though they are wider?
It is a crime against humanity that Ellsworth has not reviewed the 190 length yet